427
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, I don't mean temporary custody under controlled and hopefully educated circumstances, but those who hand it over completely. A kid simply does not need that power nor have the responsibility for full time custody.

Hell, the government wants people 18+ before they'll hand someone a gun and let them go die for something...

[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 9 points 10 months ago

Smoking and drinking age is 21. Maybe gun ownership age should be bumped up too.

[-] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

then so should the voting age.

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago
[-] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

if you can't make the decision to drink, buy a gun, or whatever else because you're supposedly not "mature" enough to do, why the fuck should you be trusted with choosing who makes those laws? while you're at it, raise the age to enroll in the military. if you can go die for your country at 18 you should be able to buy a beer, vote, and buy the gun they'll hand you at boot.

conversely if you want to lower the voting age, as some democrats suggest, then so should the drinking age, gun purchasing age etc.

there's simply no logic in being 'mature' enough for one and not the other.

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's not about principle of freedom or maturity. The legal age of drinking is where it is because of young adults drinking and driving. You can have layers of maturity that isn't give/take all responsibilities. An 18 year old should be allowed to vote because they're just as responsible as any adult to provide themselves their own food and shelter. Unless you think it should be illegal to kick someone out until they're 21.

[-] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

drinking and driving.

prob not the best example

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm lost, why?

[-] einat2346@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago

Hell, the government wants people 18+

No, I'm pretty sure that was some ancient Christian pro-lifers who came up with that rule. Government would take people younger if they could.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"... if they could."

Yea that's kinda' EXACTLY the point... they CAN make it that way, but haven't. The entire point is that modern Republicans are far more despicable than most any kind of politician from history. Yes, that includes slavers.

It takes an entire additional level of evil to step BACK IN TO social problems, and that's 100% of the modern GOP platform: bring back problems that were already solved.

[-] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They'll take you at 17 with parent's permission.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
427 points (98.0% liked)

News

23684 readers
4402 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS