47
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It’s a native feature of the device that allows its user to get enormous amounts of attention, in real life and subsequently online, by simply wearing it in public.

Sounds horrible. I guess I’m not someone who seeks attention at any cost like some people, it public is the last situation I’d use this thing in. I would feel like a complete dumbass wearing it at a coffee shop and waving my hands around.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

It's the same problem google glass had. It can be the most information rich and user friendly device in the world but if you look like a dingus wearing it, it will never catch on.

[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

That's what I thought about the elephant tusk looking AirPods yet here we are.

The Reality Distortion Field sometimes makes things hard to predict when it comes to Apple products.

[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

People on here are wired.

Air pods just look like regular apple headphones just without wires.

They sure as shit look less goofy than my huge pixel buds that stuck an inch out of my ear.

[-] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago

You’re probably thinking of the current gen AirPods rather than the original (comparison).

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'm kind of surprised people felt that way about AirPods. I don't remember that at the time. They seem quite mild to me at this point - people didn't mind wearing regular earbuds around, why worry if there's a cord or not?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

What if I already look like a dingus?

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Then if you wear it you'll be an even bigger dingus and make other dinguses look less dingusy. It would kinda be a public service of sorts I guess.

[-] double_oh_walter@feddit.nu 0 points 8 months ago

Two dingi don’t make a right. Or something.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Don't they cancel each other out?

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago
[-] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i times i is -1, though. Imagine that!

[-] darkecho@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

That's too complex for me.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Its a 3500 dollar computer you wear on your face, that can only perform basic computing tasks which can more cheaply be performed on a cell phone, draws enormous amounts of attention to the user when used in public spaces, and both the ability to use it in public spaces and the attention drawing nature of it are marketed as pros.

Ok, so its now exceedingly clear that anyone who would get this thing is a wealthy idiot who has 0 experience with an impoverished community, as if you walked through a poorer area, you would just get mugged and have this high value device stolen from you.

And frankly at this point I would morally support that happening.

Not that it likely will, as anyone both dumb amd rich enough to have this happen to them generally has no kind of on foot commute through any such impoverished area.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah, last thing I want is more attention while wearing those things and the chance that people will be able to hear the audio from the pr0n I'd be watching on it.

[-] muse@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

The masturbating in public might be a dead give away too

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Public? No officer, i was masturbating on the moon!

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

And it'll get snatched from you faster than an iphone

[-] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi -1 points 8 months ago

Simple solution. Kensington lock attached to the gonads. The device can helpfully warn others against theft with an LED projection on the wearer saying Big Cojone Security is active.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The creator of the Apollo app recently tooted about wearing his out in public, getting noticed, and then secreting away to his hotel because the attention made him uncomfortable.

I’m probably more of an Apple fan than I like, but I can’t imagine owning one of these, let alone wearing it out in public.
It seems like Apple kind of forgot that good tech should first be good tech. They’re leaning heavy on this being a lifestyle item, but like - there’s no lifestyle out there that hinges on looking like boring versions of the guy from ready player one.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

That makes sense... he's a fairly normal person. I could see using the Vision Pro at a co-working place anyway, especially for someone who's an iOS app developer.

It does seem like an oddly clunky device by Apple standards. I don't find the overall idea abhorrent and could picture owning one down the road - perhaps after they've had a few years to make the device smaller and less expensive. I have no idea what I'd use it for though. Maybe once there are more exciting games than repackaged mobile games like Super Mega Fruit Ninja.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

Oh, yeah. More power to him. A later post by him said that the app he’s developing for it has already paid for the cost of the headset. I fully believe he’s just out there working.

I’m hoping in a few generations, when they’ve got the form factor worked out, and the price under control, that it’ll be more to my liking.
I don’t think I would ever want to interact with someone while wearing it, but it could be great for all the things VR is great for, but without the creepy Facebook privacy invasion. (I know - Apple is slipping down that slope, too. They’re just not as far down it yet.)

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago

I want it like crazy. No chance I'll wear it in public after I pull the trigger.

I probably would throw it in my backpack on hikes to do some captures of stuff like waterfalls and nice mountain views. They're really nice and not something you can do with my regular camera.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

How does that work? Does it stitch together panoramas?

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

So I asked, and you can't do captures to use for the backgrounds with the headset (I'm guessing they use better equipment and maybe some processing), but it does do "spatial photos and video". That was part of the demo in the store and they're really impressive. The 15 pro can also capture a 3D video that still looks cool, but has noticeably less depth than the captures with the headset.

I'm not sure the exact technical details, but there are a whole bunch of cameras and other sensors. I'm assuming it uses all of them combined to capture the 3D photos. But there was a lot of depth in the version I saw in the demo.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
47 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

58633 readers
3560 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS