Internet access is one of those things that requires infrastructure that gets cheaper per user as it scales up.

that is... misleading at best. yes, it is cheaper to connect apartment building with 1000 apartments inside than solitary farm in the middle of nowhere, but it is still lot more expensive than you think. the fibers and putting them into ground costs fuckton of money. same goes for wireless technology. your one dollar per user does not even cover ethernet socket inside of the apartment.

The cost we pay here in the US is mostly profit for the oligopolies that control the last mile.

seems to me that you should start your own business, start putting fibers into ground and become ridiculously rich!

There are eight billion people on earth, so it’s even cheaper.

i will skip over the part where you decided that you can compare "few" and "eight" in size, and point out that your logic means you have less(more) money per user, not that it is cheaper(more expensive).

In other words, cost of the internet is inflated by force, not because internet access is expensive to construct and maintain.

in other words, you know about as much about building internet infrastructure as this guy knows about dealing with hurricanes.

just admit you pulled these numbers out of your ass and move on...