34
submitted 8 months ago by spaduf@slrpnk.net to c/mensliberation@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

This is apples to oranges to cucumbers.

We probably should cull and/or spay feral cats because they do have a large measurable ecological impact.

We shouldn't cull humans for the obvious ethical reasons, but we should try harder to treat the planet right.

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Exactly, domestic cats are native to northern Africa, and have become an invasive species every where else.

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -2 points 8 months ago

We shouldn't cull humans for the obvious ethical reasons

nor should we cull other species, for the obvious ethical reasons. If your solution to a problem is "kill until it's not a problem anymore", guess what, that's not good enough

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

I don’t think it’s that simple.

Deer behave differently in the presence of predators. They migrate less, the reproduce more manageably. Overpopulation of deer results in overgrazing where they can effectively kill entire species of plants or desertify areas. We’ve engineered an environment without their natural predators.

Culling and hunting them is different than if we caught and release neutered them.

I’m not a hunter, and I’d be fine if we just introduced wild predators like wolves (I saw a study that this was actually healthy to their population).

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -1 points 8 months ago

Exactly, it's not simple, hence the need for better, more ethical solutions. I don't know the best solution, I'm not an expert on deer or ecosystems, but I think we can do better than killing till the problem goes away

[-] charles@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

So you're okay with their suggestion of introducing wolves to help control the deer population? (which for the record, I'm not denying is genuinely a promising strategy to help with the problem)

But if you are, then how is that not also "unnecessary killing"? The end result is essentially the same thing, dead deer that become food for another specie.

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -1 points 8 months ago

I don't think that is a good solution either

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

What obvious ethical reasons?

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -1 points 8 months ago

Unnecessary killing is wrong? Killing is something to avoid? Taking anothers life should be a last resort and if it is absolutely necessary, we should always be trying to stop it or find ways to make it unnecessary? Live and let live? Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you?

idk those are pretty obvious to me, if they're not obvious to you then idk what to tell you

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

I think we just have different values when it comes to wildlife, and animals. "Live and let live" "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you" as social contracts work for human interactions, but animals lack the capacity to understand those concepts and can't hold up their end of the contract. A cat won't live and let live, a cat will kill every bird it can get it's hands on. Nature is a brutal unstable equilibrium, and human actions have made it more unstable. But as thinking animals we have the ability to reduce the harm we have caused. We need to reduce suffering where we can, and maintain the welfare not just of individual animals but of their populations and environments.

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -1 points 8 months ago

I don't think others not being able to hold up their end of the contract is a good reason to drop the contract. There are plenty of humans unable to hold up that contract either due to mental illness or just being dealt a shitty hand in life, but they still deserve to be treated with compassion. In fact, lacking the ability to understand the contract should ellicit more compassion, not less

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
34 points (85.4% liked)

Men's Liberation

1838 readers
39 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS