183

Claim comes despite draft of bill explaining media regulator will not be empowered to request specific content be removed from digital platforms

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

“The ‘mis-information bill’ is particularly dangerous for Christians who want to express an alternate view to the prevailing woke culture on gender and sexuality and for those who want to speak out against abortion,” she said.

This seems to be the main issue they have with it.

[-] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Yeah because the only ammo they have for their side is made up bullshit

[-] aranym@lemmy.name 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The bill still leaves enforcement of specific content up to the platforms.. so it seems they're implying their own posts on these topics would be generally considered misinformation? I respect the honesty lol

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Cool so they want to spread misinformation based on religion. I see this as very similar to if they’d said they wouldn’t be allowed to speak out against evolution

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
183 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32525 readers
424 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS