315
submitted 8 months ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

So this would be pretty close to what we have now, but with so much social housing people wouldn't have to worry about being homeless. Like a basic income, but for houses.

[-] r0ssar00@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

More or less: the government would out-compete the investors and builders, leaving only those with sustainable business practices left to build the difference (I say this part because a healthy business can (ideally) compete on only the merits, as opposed to trying to cheat the market and hiding costs that way as quite a few do now).

There's a whole ton of asterisks here, and we should probably steal a few ideas from Singapore (not everything, because there are things there that don't apply to here, and vice versa), but it's the general idea.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
315 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

7164 readers
143 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS