760
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

we need to get religion out of our society, it causes nothing but problems.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

You don't understand. This old book told me all the answers to life's mysteries. WoOoOooo it's infallible.

God it would be funny/sad if someone found a copy of Mike Pences auto biography 10,000 years after some cataclysm destroyed society. Than they started worshiping it.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

WoOoOooo

You said it wrong. You failed your attempt at conversion.

Wololo. Wololo. Wololo.

Welcome to the Huns.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My dad was one of those jerks that would build 30-40 priests on an Econ build and then push with them when you decided to try and crack that nut,

Poof there goes your army.

Not that he really knew what an Econ build was, or any of the other things. But he’d play this “I don’t know what I’m doing” act and get away with it, (and he wasn’t good enough to deserve a feudal rush. Just… annoying.)

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

These kind of "Christians" are about as christian as the people from Sodom.

That doesn't make it right to fuck things up for everyone else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Sorry, that's a no true Scotsman fallacy.

It doesn't matter if they aren't Christ-like. Many, many Christians, including clergy and even pontiffs have committed atrocities. They still worshiped Christ, making them Christians.

If we were to play it your way, the Crusaders weren't Christians, the Spanish Inquisition weren't Christians, the Conquistadors weren't Christians, etc. I don't think that's what you intend, but that is the problem with suggesting people who are not Christlike are not Christians.

Otherwise, we need to invent a new religion and put a huge percentage of people from the last 2000 years who thought they were called Christians into it.

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago

They are fascists. Fascist christians vs christians.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

If you read the fallacy you'd realize that you fell into the false fallacy fallacy.

To quote your linked article:

No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample by excluding the counterexample improperly.[1][2][3] Rather than abandoning the falsified universal generalization or providing evidence that would disqualify the falsifying counterexample, a slightly modified generalization is constructed ad-hoc to definitionally exclude the undesirable specific case and similar counterexamples by appeal to rhetoric.

There is plenty of countries with a christian background and still majority christian population, that wouldn't even think to discuss such absurd policies. American nutjobs cannot be considered to be representative of christianity as a whole. Much of their nutjobbery is specific to them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

American nutjobs cannot be considered to be representative of christianity as a whole.

No one said they were. They aren't. But they are Christians. That is their religion even if you don't like that it is the same as yours.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

That is not the true scotsman fallacy though. I never said they aren't Christians, i said that they are about as christian as, implying that they lack the qualities associated with it. Also i'm not a christian.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think you're misremembering. You did say they aren't Christians:

[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago

If we were to play it your way, the Crusaders weren’t Christians, the Spanish Inquisition weren’t Christians, the Conquistadors weren’t Christians, etc

All of the above are Catholic, and the vast majority of Christians I know would agree that they aren't Christian.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Catholics are the OG Christians, despite what all the seething Protestants might tell you.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Nope. That would be the orthodox christians you still find sprinkled around Palestine and Syria. The catholics are already roman "lets stabilize our empire with mixing religion and poltiics" brand of christians.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That is not only another No True Scotsman fallacy, it's also anecdotal.

Catholics are undeniably Christians no matter what other Christians may think. Catholicism likely came before their sect anyway.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I've been thinking of them as antichristian. Not as in against Christianity, but as in antichrist ...ian. From what I've heard the whole idea of the antichrist is supposed to be that Christians love the guy even though the guy goes against all of the lessons of Jesus, but he does the performative stuff. That sounds like what I see there.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Christianity is an evil ideology, and they are acting as christians.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
760 points (98.8% liked)

News

23674 readers
3261 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS