1275
submitted 10 months ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Like the USSR has more in common with the Nazis than any actual implementation of a classless, hierarchical less, stateless system.

https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

What’s your point exactly? I’m not reading some poorly written 10,000 word essay to try to figure out what you’re wanting to say.

[-] whogivesashit@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Believing that the Nazis, who systematically gassed millions as a part of their ideology, is at all akin to any of the atrocities committed under the Soviet Union is historical revisionism in order to downplay the crimes of the fascists and, what you can clearly see in this thread already, foster anti communist sentiment with barely a reason why.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 2 points 10 months ago

So it's actually a pretty interesting read but I think this paragraph gets the idea across pretty well:

(Obv out of context)

Most current antisemitism in Eastern Europe is closely related to these debates, as nationalists strive to “fix” their nations’ collaboration (or in the case of the Baltics and Ukraine, participation) in the Holocaust with revised paradigms that equal everything out. One of the poisons of ultranationalism is the perceived need to construct a perfect history (no country on the planet has one of those). Another is hatred of local Jewish communities who have memory, or family, or collective memory, of nationalist neighbors turning viciously on their neighbors in 1941, and of the Soviets being responsible for their own grandparents or parents being saved from the Holocaust. In America, this would be akin to someone hating African Americans for having a different opinion of Washington or Jefferson because they were slaveholders.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Okay, now I’m just confused as to the relevance of it being commented in response to my comment.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 0 points 10 months ago

Hey man I'm just a third party don't look at me

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

A Jewish linguist/historian/activist talking about how equating the Soviets and the Nazis is rhetoric used to justify current and past antisemitism including holocaust collaboration.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Ah, so it’s being used as chud fud.

My comparison of the two stems from their harsh authoritarian/totalitarian nature as seen from an anarchist lens, nothing to do with genocide.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah so the thing is you're still doing it, the whole "authoritarian" thing is another way of doing a false equivalence between the two.

If you want to do an anarchist critique compare the USSR to bourgeoise democracies, it is a closer comparison.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

To do so would be to ignore the worst elements of the USSR, so I don't know why I would do that.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

You don't know a lot of the history of bourgeois democracies if you think you can't compare the worst the USSR has done with what bourgeois democracies have done.

Maybe you'd want to do it to stop taking part in holocaust trivialization, but you also insulted the Dovid Katz essay so IDK.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe you want to drop the fud and trying to inject the holocaust into a comparison as means to discredit a point when it was never made in the first place. There's no defending the USSR or ML, so I'm not going to bite and engage in an argument designed to downplay the evils of it.

And that essay was utter wank filled with needlessly gratuitous language that languished on for countless paragraphs. It easily could have been condensed into a paragraph or two with some historical examples thrown in to justify the argument.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There’s no defending the USSR or ML, so I’m not going to bite and engage in an argument designed to downplay the evils of it.

Lol, yes there is, and it is a very simple argument:

  1. A transitional state moving towards communism is less violent than a capitalist state.

  2. All large anarchist attempts at governing were basically the same as the USSR under war socialism(Catalonia, which started much more industrialized, and lost, because of, among other things, anarchist organizational failure) or worse (free state of Ukraine, which led to a wave of pogroms because they refused to suppress reactionary elements))

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1275 points (89.6% liked)

Memes

45910 readers
2476 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS