1024
submitted 1 year ago by AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Like_Pravana@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

No way. I don't want my employer to also be my landlord. Nothing good could come of that.

[-] Noughmad@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You commit 16 lines, what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt

St. Peter, don't you call me 'cause I can't go

I owe my soul to the company store

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Some people say a man is made outta blood. A code monkey's made out of Fritos and crud. Fritos and crud and skin and bone. A back that's weak and a mind that's strong...

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Nice, I like it. My back feels called out though.

[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Sounds illegal until I realized its tech workers who refuse to unionize and think they are getting paid bank but to live like a virtual slave.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 year ago

As one in the industry, it's incredibly frustrating. Colleagues have been saying "oh, we get all of these perks and get nice salaries, we don't need a union" while others are bucket-crabbing with "you make big money, why do you need a union?", both overlooking the immense amounts of unpaid overtime that are endemic. Then, there's the push for RTO, which does nothing to benefit employees and would be readily prevented by strong unions.

[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

it's very easy to ignore social inequities if you spend all your time working for a shitty company making absolute bank

[-] aport@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

think they are getting paid bank

Objectively, they are.

[-] Oyster_Lust@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

A lot of companies used to run company towns. Toyota still does, as far as I know. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a return of that sort of thing with real estate prices getting absurd and companies wanting to drive people back into the office.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

No no you don't understand. It's work from home but work IS the home! You see it makes perfect sense.

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hah, I actually did that when I first started working for a small company.

The co-founder also rented out a house he owned as a duplex.

Actually wasn't that bad, he charged slightly below market rate, and was pretty attentive. But definitely felt weird and I was happy to move out after a few years. It's just an unnecessary source of potential drama.

Now my manager lives there, and has for five years.

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The good that comes from that, from the perspective of the boss-landlord is that if your employee-tenants start getting the idea to strike, you control both their income and their shelter, so they reconsider.

Then you offer on-site housing to your scabs.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

What if you got to lord it over the other tenants and didn't pay rent?

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
1024 points (98.5% liked)

News

23664 readers
3551 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS