1622
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The quotes provide the same meaning, basically that you are parodying the other side.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Quotes are usually reserved for actually quoting someone else (for example), and not making a statement about parodying the other side.

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It's a pretty commonly used format on many parts of the internet, I think most people would interpret it that way, especially when everybody reading will see that what is being quoted is obviously untrue.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well I guess I'm being nuanced here, but I don't think in this specific case that works out that way, considering what it's replying to.

In other words I would agree with your interpretation if the reply was parodying something I said directly. Otherwise it just seems something of a non sequitur.

Anyway, I get what you're trying to communicate towards me, I even agree that sometimes it is using the way you describe. I would just think that's done the minority of the time, and the majority of the time quotes are used to actually quote someone.

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I felt like "/s" gives the "joke" away so I opted not to have it and have people actually think critically, especially since the statement is false.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Do you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.

Fair enough, and that's the answer I was looking for.

The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you're right, it could match the first sentence, I guess.

I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

It's a cynical statement, lighten up

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

lighten up

Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur.

Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I think if it was intended to quote someone they would put who they were quoting. Otherwise there's not really a point.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

So you’ve never read fiction?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, in all the decades I've been on this planet, I've never read one book of fiction of any type whatsoever.

/s

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
1622 points (98.5% liked)

News

23669 readers
3341 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS