1139
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I installed NetGuard about a month ago and blocked all internet to apps, unless they're on a whitelist. No notifications from this particular system app (that can't be disabled) until recently when it started making internet connection requests to google servers. Does anyone know when this became a thing?

Edit 2: I bought my Pixel 6 phone outright, directly from Google's Australian store. I have no creditors.

Were the courts not enough control for creditors? Since when are they allowed to lock you out of your purchased property without a court order?

I don't even live in the US, so what the actual fuck?

Edit 1: You can check it's installed (~~stock~~ Pixel 6 android 14) Settings > Apps > All Apps > three dot menu, Show system > search "DeviceLockController".

I highly recommend getting NetGuard, you can enable pro features via their website if you have the APK for as low as 0.10€, but donate more, because it's amazing. You can also purchase via Google Play store.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 27 points 9 months ago

That's just disgusting, but still so normal in the market religion. Google act as judge and executioner above all local laws. Never ever buy a phone that can't be rooted and reconfigured. ..oh, and never again deal with anything Google.. ..oh, or any other big US tech for that matter. ..fuckit, never deal with ANY Capitalist cheater/scumbag unless you have to.

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately GrapheneOS still only supports Google Pixels, otherwise I would use something else in a heartbeat

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago
[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago

I did before I used Graphene, and my experience was a lot worse to be honest. Has it improved over the last two years?

[-] nolight@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You are much better off using a Pixel with GrapheneOS as far as privacy and security are concerned. Believe it or not, Google Pixels are the best smartphones to use de-googled. Truly outstanding.

Look up why Graphene team only supports these phones, it's on their FAQ page.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago
[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lots of apps straight up didn't work, that was the main thing. The other thing was I had to use a VPN app to block app network access, something that is a built in feature of Graphene. Further, Graphene has much more built in security features including actually using secure boot.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Did you get your apps from F-droid? I run Lineage completely stock with F-droid. It might be good to make a distinction between regular Lineage OS and Google Lineage OS.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

I'm not to the point where I can use 100% F-Droid apps, unfortunately.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Exactly, I think we as a community need to have an accepted transition from proprietary spyware to free alternatives. I think step one would be to move to free apps.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

I agree, and would say that 90% of my apps are. But there's a few (mostly banking related) that I can't pass up since the mobile websites are unusable.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 11 points 9 months ago

Got a non-capitalist phone for me?

Sincerely as a hater...

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago

Huawei is a employee owned and communist state backed company - not very capitalist, at least by comparison.

They're being hammered with export restrictions and sanctions and federal bans and executive orders to keep that from being a viable alternative in the US, but if you're outside that might be an option.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lol as if. It is owned by the trade union who workers are required to be a part of, but have 0 say in.

The "union officials" are not chosen by the workers, but by management who are chosen by their management and so on until the Chinese head trade union officials which are party men who, just like in the old soviet Union, are essentially the chinese bourgeoisie. It is essentially a fascist oligarchy which is the exact same as under capitalism, just a different structure and cover story.

The workers get 0 say and there is no evidence that they share in the profit either, and huawei does not deny that structure either.

https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/22/why-its-so-hard-to-know-who-owns-huawei/?guccounter=1

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
1139 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

32492 readers
365 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS