255
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

US scientists achieve net energy gain for second time in a fusion reaction::The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility achieved the feat using lasers to fuse two atoms

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] veroxii@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Maybe the easiest method is to create the fusion reaction in space because then you don't need to worry about containment. Have a big ball of fusion going nonstop and then beam that energy to earth.

Then have collectors which receive that beamed down energy. You could put them everywhere... Maybe close to where you need the energy like directly on top of buildings and houses.

[-] persolb@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

And blast the whole planet with radiation? Are you crazy?

[-] veroxii@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Won't someone think of the Irish people on beaches?

[-] Patius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Admittedly, you'd need a layer of ozone (self sustaining so long as you don't have some kind of chemical that causes ozone to not form, but who'd have that?). And probably some kind of hot liquid metal contraption in the middle of the earth, sustained by, like Uranium decay or tidal friction or something, to generate a magnetic field to protect us.

Some Irish people would probably still die of radiation poisoning on beaches, but that's a sacrifice the rest of us are willing to make.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are adding quite a big layer of complexity there... As astronauts will tell you, even screwing a screw is pretty challenging out there. Maintaining an unrestrained fusion reaction looks like extra challenging

Edit. Sorry, I missed the joke

[-] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 22 points 1 year ago

He’s making a joke. Talking about solar.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahhh, ok, thanks. Stupid me.

Nowadays people come up with the most weird stuff on the internet, I really thought it was a serious idea.

My bad

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago
[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's a good complementary energy source.

With it very low efficency and bad predictability, you still need a good stable and predictable baseline energy production.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
255 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

60130 readers
2810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS