-13
Disagreaements
(lemmy.ca)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
-13 points (15.8% liked)
Vancouver
1444 readers
1 users here now
Community for the city of Vancouver, BC
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I do agree that depending on the topic, if someone doesn't know the perspective you are coming from, then it's better to stay silent about it. I only share full honesty of my views with people who come specific cultures, so they would know the references and background when I say my full uncensored opinion.
I don't believe a disagreement even has to be explained. If while someone is talking, you say "I disagree" and the person can continue their point, you've expressed your disagreement, and they don't need to inquire further, simply leave it tht you disagree and that's that.
By original question is why it seems if tere is a simple expression of disagreement, people either end the conversation there and shut it down, or make up a reason to run away from the conversation as if they were harmed by someone saying "I don't think so, I can't go along with that."
Because when people have a conversation they try to share common experiences. There are ways to say "I disagree" that won't shut down the conversation. Just saying that leaves the other person no options to continue the conversation because you are shutting down their topic. A few folks here already gave great answers so I won't repeat the advice.
True for the majority of topics.
Unfortunately, less so for things like politics and religion.
And especially when both are combined and have become a core part of that person's personal identity.
Ironically, folks who broach the topic on politics and religion are typically also having those things as a core part of their personality.
I think typically polite company dictates no religion, no politics no money talk. Been that way forever.
Absolutely agree.
But unfortunately increasing numbers of people seem to feel the need to inject those topics (and their strong opinions on those topics) into otherwise normal conversation.