697
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Alk@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

What is everyone's opinions on the sound quality of vinyl?

I understand the collectibility of physical media, and the novelty of owning a vinyl and the machine that plays them. The large art piece that is the case (and often the disc itself). Showing support for your favorite artists by owning physical media from them.

Those are great reasons to collect vinyl.

But a lot of my friends claim vinly is of higher audio quality than anything else, period. This is provably false, but it seems to be a common opinion.

How often have you seen this and what are your thoughts on it?

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

Technically CD quality digital is superior, but the recording and mixing can have a lot to do with it. For example, it could be that an decades old Dark Side Of The Moon on vinyl (played on proper equipment) could sound better than a modern remastered CD with maximized loudness (See the "loudness wars").

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 27 points 9 months ago

It's not impossible, although the loudness wars are pretty much over nowadays. All major music services and players have volume normalisation, many by default, so there's not much point to it any longer.

Also it's pretty tough to find a decades old record still in mint condition, and the sound quality of vinyl gets worse every time you play it.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

and the sound quality of vinyl gets worse every time you play it.

If you handle them correctly, it will not happen to any noticeable degree in any of our lifetimes or the following generations. It is durable material.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 9 months ago

Higher audio quality than CD? No, that is demonstrably false.

More pleasant to listen to than CD or other digital formats? Yes, that I agree with. It's entirely subjective, but I'm definitely not alone in the feeling. The fact it is hard to quantify is why lots of people don't "get" vinyl until they've sat and heard it on a decent system. Something about it is pleasing. As another commenter mentioned, it might just be the imperfections.

So I guess it's a bit of a philosophical question. If CDs technically sound better, but vinyl sounds more pleasing: does the vinyl then sound better? People tend to chase pleasure, and in the time it takes someone to explain how much lower the noise floor is on CD or how we can only perceive so many samples, etc, etc -- you could have been chilling with multiple records and had a great listening experience.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

If it was just about the sound, then you could get the exact same results by recording the vinyl player directly to a lossless format and playing that back, but it wouldn't be quite the same. Big part of it is just the fact that you are using a vinyl player and these huge fragile disks that makes it an enjoyable experience by itself.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Of course. There is no doubt that the ritual of handling the record and playing it on the turntable is a huge part of it. Personally it makes me appreciate the music more because it is kind of an effort to get it playing in the first place, and you just want to listen to the record in a session, instead of just having it as a backdrop which so much streamed music is.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, totally agree. Vinyl rips still lack something. A lot of it is about practice, which makes it harder to quantify.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 5 points 9 months ago

IMO is just placebo effect. In a blind experiment, all else being equal, I doubt you would be able to tell the difference between a vinyl and a CD. That's my two cents

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago

I know for a fact I would hear the difference -- but primarily because of the imperfections in the vinyl, as well as the different bass response. I can rule out placebo.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Something about it is pleasing. As another commenter mentioned, it might just be the imperfections.

I think it's the slight hissing sound you hear as the needle drags. That faint, slightly pink noise isn't dissimilar from white noise people use to go to sleep, and I think human brains like that sort of sound.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

I know it's not highest quality.

For me, the imperfect sound is what makes a nicer experience. Slight hum, little pop once in a while, teensy skip, etc.

Not to mention that I'm far more inclined to listen to an entire album because of the need to interact with the vinyl to set the needle and flip sides.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

At the risk of sounding critical of your hobby, to argue the imperfections improve the experience sounds somewhat culty.

I understand there is something akin to "character" which you don't get from something highly polished. I know when things sound too clean it can feel sterile.

I accept vinyl has a collectors value, but anything claims regarding preference come across as either pretentious or deluded (to me, as someone who probably can't tell the difference).

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I don't proclaim that vinyl is superior or something everyone should listen to.

Just trying to convey how I hear it.

98% of my listening is my MP3 playing from my phone's Bluetooth.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Vinyl has a slow progression in quality degradation due to friction that creates a certain kind of sound warmth that is pleasing to our ears. This can also be relicated digitally, but the imperfections and feelings associated with the physical ritual actions of loading a record can't.

Vinyl just has more engagement going on despite the sound quality being lower. Kind of like how some people have fondness for fireplaces despite central heating being technically better at maintaining a warm temperature.

Some people confuse the extra engagement with sound quality because a lot of people just don't think things through.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Vinyl has a slow progression in quality degradation due to friction

With conventional record players with a mechanical head. I suppose that you could probably use an optical one -- I remember reading about that being used by archivists.

google

Yeah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_turntable

The thing I think I remember reading about was apparently this related thing:

IRENE

The IRENE system uses a high-powered confocal microscope that follows the groove path as the disc or cylinder (i.e. phonograph cylinder) rotates underneath it, thereby obtaining detailed images of the audio information.[9] Depending on whether the groove is cut laterally, vertically, or in a V-shape, the system may make use of tracking lasers or different lighting strategies to make the groove visible to the camera. The resulting images are then processed with software that converts the movement of the groove into a digital audio file.[10]

An advantage of the system over traditional stylus playback is that it is contactless, and so avoids damaging the audio carrier or wearing out the groove during playback.[1] It also allows for the reconstruction of already broken or damaged media such as cracked cylinders or delaminating lacquer discs, which cannot be played with a stylus. Media played on machines which are no longer produced can also be recovered.[6] Many skips or damaged areas can be reconstituted by IRENE without the noises that would be created by stylus playback.[5] However, it can also result in the reproduction of more noise, as imperfections in the groove are also more finely captured than with a stylus.

considers

If you can get multiple physical copies of an analog recording, you could probably scan them and use statistical analysis to combine information from the physical copies, eliminate damage from any one copy.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago

Yes, I was referring to the most common way of playing vinyl records with a physical needle.

Combining multiple records could give you an average, but it would both lose the things that make vinyl and experience like pops from dust specs and imperfections. Plus a cleaner copy could be had from the masters used to press the vinyl records. You know, the same master that is used to make exact duplicates for CDs.

Recreating an approximation of a lost master recording from multiple vinyl records with voice reduction on the imperfections would be an interesting idea, so my guess is someone has already done that 😉

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

that engagement materially impacts sound quality because you're actively listening.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago

It impacts the perception of sound quality, not the actual sound quality.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

You could get engagement through digital audio files too, though.

But I'd argue that it doesn't affect the sound quality, but the enjoyment of the sound. The sound waves themselves don't actually change because we're actively engaging.

[-] JoeCoT@fedia.io 14 points 9 months ago

The best explanation I've seen is that music is mixed differently for CD/streaming and vinyl.

For mass market, the move has been to mix for louder bass and similar things. The idea being that it makes the music more popular. But it also makes it difficult to appreciate anything but the bass.

On vinyl, you can't max out bass like that, it won't work on the format. So they have to give it a normal mix instead, making it sound better. In theory CDs should sound better than vinyl, but because of the music production trends, it doesn't currently.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

This is correct, although it's not the bass that is limited on vinyl; it's the dynamic range compression (or 'loudness') in general.

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Published 1989, posted on YouTube 17 yards ago:

https://youtu.be/3Gmex_4hreQ

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/3Gmex_4hreQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?

That's the one good selling point I've heard for vinyl so far.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

I like this take. it's probably also why I'm gravitating towards cassettes now, you don't need a special mix but you also can't just max the volume because magnetic media saturates and distorts quite quickly.

[-] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 7 points 9 months ago

CD sound is better. But I like how big the pictures of the albums are with vinyl. Vinyl is more about the ritual though. With all the pop sounds and stuff I wouldn't prefer it over CD.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

A new record sounds pretty good when played on a good turntable with a good cartridge, but it's not as good as a properly mixed CD or lossless audio file. A worn or dirty record sounds like crap. A cheap turntable will also sound like crap and a ceramic cartridge wears out records fairly quickly.

With a CD, there is very little difference in sound quality between the cheapest player you can find and a high end player. The CD will always sound the same until it's too worn out to play at all.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I like to buy older albums that were mastered for vinyl, like Steely Dan, some prog rock like Yes or Pink Floyd. It gets a lot closer to listening to how the artists would have been hearing their product

[-] micka190@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Either 0 difference from digital or worse due to skipping/bad record quality. Rap records are especially bad and I stopped buying them.

Personally, I buy them because my internet is unreliable, it makes for some nice decoration and it's nice to actually own something in 2024 (especially since Spotify keeps deleting random artists/songs from my playlists).

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I enjoy the warmer sound of vinyl but I buy the albums I love on it because of the lack o convenience. I can't shuffle and I have to actually interact with it every 20ish minutes to flip or change discs. It makes me actually listen to music, track order, mix, and properly enjoy the work that went into the whole album making process.

So I use streaming when I just want something on in the background and vinyl when I want to properly listen to an album.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Vinyl is worse quality, the vinyl disk's height is a physical constraint that CDs / DVDs do not have.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Define quality.

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Vinyl sounds good, but has too much noise to be the best. Although that could just be my cat's fault, realistically - i spend a lot time removing hair from records.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Too much noise? Older records sure. But new stuff? On mine you can't tell the difference. There's no hum, no crackling, no noise. It is recommended to brush your records before playing though. Perhaps that's the problem?

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

The records are new, and I brush them before each use. I've used different carts so that's probably not the issue either. Maybe I just got all bad records.. Maybe I could hear a difference on yours. Who knows at this point

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Odd. But yeah, many factors.

[-] Imprudent3449@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not an audiophile, but had experience with vinyl and CDs while growing up in the 90s and imo vinyl COULD sound better if you spent a lot of money on high end equipment. But with the equipment us normies had, the cds sounded much better. It had a much lower barrier if you didn't have a large amount of time and money to invest. I'd suspect things are similar now.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

First problem would be defining what "quality" means. On one hand vynil just has a continuous grove which needle follows. For this reason it's infinitely precise, as there's no interpolation or sample frequency. But on the other hand if master was digital and of shit quality, then benefits of analog mean nothing. Also widely used 44KHz sample rate is no accident, it's exactly double of what human hearing can perceive. So even if you go higher, average listener wouldn't be able to hear the difference.

Music is also mastered differently for vynil. Base is centered and audio is processed to reduce chances of skipping tracks. This is why decent phono amplifier is needed to revert those changes. Digital stays good or shitty no matter how many times you copy the file.

Overall sound quality is good, in both digital world and analogue. I have both high quality FLACs and some really great records which people would struggle to figure out if the sound they are hearing is digital or not. Personally I prefer vynil because the centered base. It makes other instruments more pronounced and you get to experience same music in a bit of a different way. Vynil being manual as it is also forces you to listen to entire side since it's not easy to change tracks and authors by clicking next.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I read somewhere that about 50% of vinyl owners don't have a player. Presumably that 50% only have very few records and bought them for the looks, but still.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Vinyl records sounds great despite their technical inferiority to CDs and streaming (with the right equipment of course, but that applies to all formats). They do not necessarily sound better, but there is an element of customisation with them which you can't get with CDs or streaming. Most importantly the cartridge on your turntable. Different cartridges have different soundscapes. There is of course an element of quality connected to price of cartridge, but over a certain price you are not necessarily buying a better sound but a different sound. Many vinyl record listeners, especially audiophiles, have different cartridges which they can switch out on their turntable, based on which kind of sound you want coming out of your system.

I know it may be difficult to comprehend for people who haven't personally listened to such differences themselves, but I assure you it is not audiophile snake oil, it is a very noticeable phenomenon. That is a pretty unique capability of vinyl which I can't really compare to anything with other formats.

[-] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

Its worse in the best way IMO.

The main reason I buy vinyl is for the other reasons you mentioned, but the imperfections of vinyl gives it a less robotic and sterile feel. It’s like listening to digital drums vs acoustic drums.

There’s also the ritual of playing vinyl that’s real satisfying

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

people are idiots, possibly from inhaling the toxic fumes of unregulated PVC

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
697 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2419 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS