417
submitted 9 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Besides a King James Version translation, it includes copies of the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Pledge of Allegiance, as well as a handwritten chorus of the famous Greenwood song.

Of course he used the KJV. The version that no modern Christian couldn't read if they wanted to and the version that basically every fundamentalist Christian has on their bookshelf and never opens.

[-] Kabloink@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They probably chose the KJV because it's in the public domain.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

For $59.99 i think you could stay at a Motel 6 and just take the bible from the nightstand.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Gotta love the 'words of God' being kept behind an intelectual property wall.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So, if this book isn't transformative in any wood, can it be copyrighted? Just saying, maybe someone should sell a "God Bless the US" Bible for $49.99

[-] Kabloink@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

It includes a handwritten chorus from that Greenwood song. So, you would have to leave that out

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Or.. we get Weird Al to write a parody song instead.

[-] RatBin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Why, you could assemble it yourself with some web searches. But it is ... bad, and are they even buying it. It'd be quite offensive if I were more attached to the question.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Ooh the fundies get mad mad when anyone suggests that perhaps the KJV isn't the only, or even best, version. And it's always the ones who post their dumb Bible journaling where they've highlighted all but like, 3 words. Bitch, you didn't read all that. You would've known what to actually highlight if you did.

[-] RatBin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's not necessarily hard to read, but I feel like a lot of christians don't read it as much as they think. Time consuming, sure. But than again there aren't artifacts to hold in your invetory you know, you're supposed to read it. I mean, for real. While we're at it why not reading the ancient greek translation, which is one of the earliest we know of.

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 6 points 9 months ago

I take offence at that, we have a KJV on our book shelf and it is never opened and I certainly don't call my self a fundamentalist Christian, or even a Christian.

It is sitting with the greek myths, british folk law, NZ pre European accounts/trade/culture, and the section with all the language/translation etc

[-] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Grew up Baptist, and KJV is the one Baptists open and read and swear is the only "correct" one. And before you say Baptists don't read it, well... a good half of them do, maybe more.

Baptists are hateful little effers though, that often know a lot of Bible, yet follow very few of the key points.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

I'm still absolutely shocked at the complete blindness, that this dude would get away with selling the Bible for his own aggrandizement, packed with literal idolatry, and face very little resistance from it.

This bizarre conflation of Christianity with patriotic capitalism and flag worship is one of the biggest real life conspiracies of our time, and it was absolutely a hostile takeover of the church by corporate and state interests.

Churches were once considered "too leftist" because they served their communities and preached the Gospel of Christ, and if they were involved in politics, it was definitely not to engage in politician worship.

It makes me weep inside, how extinguished the light has become...

Remember, when Satan offered Jesus "power over all the nations of the world", it wouldn't have been a temptation if he didn't have it to offer... If this isn't proof of that, I dunno what is ...

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
417 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS