288

TL;DR there was a backdoor found in the XZ program. All major distros have been updated but it is recommended that you do a fresh install on systems that are exposed to the internet and that had the bad version of the program. Only upstream distros were affected.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 111 points 9 months ago

stable release of Arch Linux is also affected. That distribution, however, isn't used in production systems.

Don't tell me how to live my life, Ars Technica.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 38 points 9 months ago
[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 42 points 9 months ago

They mean a variant you use in a stable, like to run an automatic feeder for horses. According to Ars Technica, however, you are not to use it in your production stable.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah, screw em. I use mine to produce lots of stuff.
I try to avoid producing too much manure though.

I think lots of IT people have an extremely limited experience of what it is to produce something.
I mean if opening a ssh hole to the whole world to fuck with is an important part of what they consider "production" - well I'm not really into those types of websites.

[-] testeronious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

yes, like my marriage

[-] Vegoon@feddit.de 21 points 9 months ago

I am not deep enough in it, but from the arch-announce mailinglist:

From the upstream report [1]:

openssh does not directly use liblzma. However debian and several other distributions patch openssh to support systemd notification, and libsystemd does depend on lzma.

Arch does not directly link openssh to liblzma, and thus this attack vector is not possible. You can confirm this by issuing the following command:

$(command -v sshd)

However, out of an abundance of caution, we advise users to remove the malicious code from their system by upgrading either way. This is because other yet-to-be discovered methods to exploit the backdoor could exist.

https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 months ago

You should not run Arch in production. Boom, I said it

[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 30 points 9 months ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago
[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 37 points 9 months ago
[-] oo1@kbin.social 16 points 9 months ago

If I pray to you will I be able to get my printer to work?

[-] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

There are some things that not even a god has the power to do.

[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Made out of Empty cups

[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Ars Technica sounds like a weirdo to me these days. Loves to attack big techs (although understandable), now adds this to their description of Arch.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
288 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

32492 readers
841 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS