348
submitted 9 months ago by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm kinda against defederation or blocking anything at an instance level, unless the instance causes straight up legal issues or is literally created for the sole purpose of harassment

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

When they have a track record like this?

ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard

ZUCK: just ask

ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns

FRIEND: what!? how’d you manage that one?

ZUCK: people just submitted it

ZUCK: i don’t know why

ZUCK: they “trust me”

ZUCK: dumb fucks

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, I think Threads meets your litmus test requirements.

It is a certainty that Threads will heavily influence the future development of Activity Pub. This will inevitibly lead to the corporatization and enshittification of any service Threads can affect.

The only resistance we can offer against this is defederation and noncompliance with the will of the behemoth.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

You’re missing the point. Fedi Garden is threatening to defederate from anyone who doesn’t defederate from Threads.

Imagine if other instances start doing this about things that aren’t threads. “Delist from db0 or world will delist you”, “delist from Lemmy.ca or Lemmy.ml will delist you.”

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I understand your "what if" scenarios, but this is an existential crisis that needs to be resisted against with all instances working in concert. This is not a "what if" scenario. This is the actual iceberg and it is big enough to ruin the fediverse for all instances, no matter their affiliation with the garden.

So, we either unite to defend the independence of the fediverse, or we let a corporate giant take it by ovewhelming us with their "important updates for your security" until we are all assimilated.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Ngl, this screams “think of the children.”

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
348 points (96.3% liked)

Fediverse

17852 readers
6 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS