221
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Being reported as a "low quality source", while they officially are categorized as "mixed credibility":

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/truth-out/

"Overall, we rate Truthout strongly Left Biased based on story selection and political positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to publishing a false story and promoting anti-GMO propaganda. (5/15/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 12/01/2022)"

That distinctly anti-science angle doesn't seem to apply here, so I'll allow it.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Interesting. I’ve never seen their anti-science stiff

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Yeah, me either, but GMO stuff sets peoples hackles up so it doesn't surprise me.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Blanket Anti-GMO hysteria is bad of course but there are arguments to be made against things like terminator seeds being used as monopoly tools and pesticide resistant GMOs enabling overuse of them.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or Monsanto seeds that spread and are billable:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_legal_cases

But that's different from the whole "GMO causes cancer!!!!" nonsense.

The folks who get all up in a bind don't realize that humans have been modifying crops since... well, since we invented crops. :)

Someone posted "maize" to lemmy as an example of what humans have done. Lemmy see if I can find it...

Edit Looks like it was removed for linking to FB, but here's a screenshot:

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Having skimmed through the article mediafactcheckbias linked, it's kinda weird. At first glance it seems like it's raising legitimate concern, but it never specifies what.

It sounds like it's making a case that modified Bt toxins could cause unexpected problems in the ecosystem or for other crops on the long run by targeting more insect species than what it's designed to, a seemingly valid concern, but never actually reaches any conclusion, instead it uses handwaves like "unexpected toxicological properties " and "protecting public health and the environment" which make it look like they want you to think GMO are poisonous to people without actually saying it.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
221 points (91.7% liked)

World News

38755 readers
3705 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS