299
submitted 9 months ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes and I'm saying in a more sexually open society we'd just admit that people lust after people of all genders, and include some others in the data set.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

I disagree. I think in a more sexually open society people wouldn't be treated like pieces of meat. They'd be treated like people. Their opinions about sexual content would be considered.

[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think in a more sexually open society ...their opinions about sexual content would be considered.

Like how I said in my original comment "switch Lena's photo if she doesn't want it in there anymore"...

So as you can see, I was already saying a sexually open world would be considerate, even though you're phrasing it as if we're disagreeing. Perhaps this is because you wish the conversation to go to an oppositional and hence repressive/aggressive place.

I think that would be a reasonable response if one felt subjugated and traumatized, injured and trapped by the current patriarchal systems of sex and power imbalance, and it might be difficult to see how sexuality, nudity, and pornography could be sociologically dealt with, understood, or theorised about outside of that framework.

Thus a dream of a better world can be stolen and held back be the pre-existing and persisting traumas of how we treat sex, bodies, nudity, and self-image in this one.

But there can be sex positive and body positive form of sex, sexuality and pornography that include being comfortable with nudity, and even taboo. I was proposing such a parallel world...

But you continue to cast it as the same as this world. That is your choice, but to continue to make that same choice is an act of killing communication and hence progress on the issues of this world.

The nature of fiction even in a passing comment, like the one I made, is to explore the possible and impossible. So beware what you make impossible.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

It's not just her opinion on the picture that matters though. Other women (and probably other people) don't want it to be used as a standard test image.

I like that you're making it out like I'm saying anything is impossible. I'm not. I'm stating that if people say they're uncomfortable with something then they're uncomfortable with it. It doesn't matter how sexually open anything it. People's opinions and consent are important, both that of the subject of the photo as well as other people in the field using this photo.

[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, I'm saying in a more sexually liberated society, one that's more comfortable with nudity and the human body, people might go: "Oh of course we can include nudes in the data set, here's a bunch more!".

You're saying in a sexually liberated society one more comfortable with nudity, people would still be viewing this in a state of discomfort.

You came here to say this, regardless of anything I said, and so are yourself not interested in the consent of all parties in this very conversation (which is with a person by the way).

I am just a prop, and you simply don't need to listen to me. Because you will say what you have to say and will mutilate whatever was being said in order to return to the status quo regardless of the comment you were replying to.

This isn't about me, it's about what you have to say. So I hope you feel better about having a one sided and belittling conversation.

I find you inadequate as an intelligent chat partner, so will block you now. I suspect that you will gain satisfaction from this, as a repressive. So enjoy.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

I have thoroughly read every comment you posted. You're just ignoring the main thing I'm saying. You're essentially saying there will be one opinion in a society. I'm saying that, no matter what, people will have differing views of different things. We just need to listen to people, no matter what our society is or becomes. None of that matters. If people are uncomfortable with it in a sexually liberated society, then they're uncomfortable with it.

I find you inadequate as an intelligent chat partner, so will block you now. I suspect that you will gain satisfaction from this, as a repressive. So enjoy.

I guess you'll never see this, but your incesent insults say more about you than anything.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
299 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60130 readers
2812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS