15
submitted 6 months ago by booja@booja.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago

Maybe it's because all the younger generations really are smarter than mine (boomer). For most of my 50 years in the workforce, I was told:

  • I was lucky to have a job (justification for low wages, small raises, and no raises)
  • I had to go along to get along (justification for shitty working conditions, some of which contravened labour law and safety regulations)
  • I had to work hard to get ahead (justification for perpetual short staffing, stupid shifts, and excessive overtime)
  • I had to prove myself to get promotions (actually do the work of the next level up without the next level pay)
  • Training and certifications were for my benefit or just the cost of getting in the door (justification for the gutting and even elimination of on-the-job and employer-sponsored training as well as not having higher pay to go with more training and education)

For most of my working life, I took my father's advice to demand both my legal rights and my human dignity at great cost to my employment success. The 15 years I tried it "the right way" just left me exploited and burned out.

If falling productivity is a result of people finally demanding that laws and human dignity be not just respected but honoured and advanced, then I say let it fall.

I've heard people say that maybe it's time to reset productivity expectations or even redefine what is meant by productivity.

I think they make good cases for those things, but maybe it's time for, I don't know, something so radical as to be unthinkable. Like maybe it's time for the business community to look inward for the problem.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

All your points I lost belief in early in my career. I've got no certs, just a little bit of college education. I think I'm considered a millennial. So far, I've been right. I have 2 jobs, one of them I make >130k a year and the other >40k. I'm not working that hard, if I'm being completely honest. I also have a lot of costs and it's still only enough to live pay cheque to pay cheque.

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

170k and still living paycheque to paycheque? That truly sucks. Honestly, I can't even imagine it. My heart goes out to you.

We live in rural Saskatchewan in a self-renovated 1968 mobile home on a leased lot. That is the single best decision we've ever made. If we had stayed in Saskatoon, we'd be either still be working, maybe full-time, or destitute. As it is, our annual rent and taxes is about the same as the monthly rent is in our old apartment. Some careful budgeting, a garden, and plenty of fish from the nearby lake means that we actually have a pretty decent lifestyle on <40k (combined income).

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

That's impressive for less than 40k. I'm definitely in a more expensive area and have a mortgage and several dependants so all that's working against me too. Got lucky with the housing situation though and my mortgage is actually quite small, by a lot, compared to anyone else where I'm at.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
15 points (89.5% liked)

Canada

7164 readers
281 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS