846
submitted 6 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/firefox@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

as a furry myself, i feel qualified to explain this in absence of the entire community.

IMO. Something is classifiable as furry if it more closely resembles an "objectively furry character" than if it more closely resembles a human character. I.E. a human with a tail and ears is simply not furry enough to be furry. Hence why neko exists. But if it more closely resembles an actual furry I.E. it's skin is covered in fur entirely, than i think it's fair to classify it as a furry.

TL;DR moving from left to the right, once you pass the median character, that's all furry, everything on the other side is more closely related to humans.

One of the primary differences between humans and apes is the hair after all.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
846 points (97.7% liked)

Firefox

4057 readers
15 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS