440
submitted 8 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 154 points 8 months ago

Unnecessary journalist fluff around the source material from Mozilla.

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago

which they didnt even link to by the way, not that I saw anyway

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks for this.

When Google said they were stopping 3rd party cookies, I thought it was just a simple security setting. The new system, Protected Audience, seems like 3rd party cookies without the whack-a-mole approach of listing every cookie advertisers can take, especially since there is nothing stopping data collectors from extracting data from it, like what Mozilla said in the article.

Hopefully there are fake data dumpers or cleaners for Protected Audience which would reduce the effectiveness of this system but looking how the Chrome team treats browser extensions, I doubt it.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
440 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

32482 readers
231 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS