75
Microsoft wants to move Windows fully to the cloud
(www.theverge.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37804 readers
369 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't really want to switch to Linux, Microsoft, please stop pushing me to. I will, but I'd rather not. Ffs.
I tried it in the past, admittedly a long time ago, and it just wasn't great for my workflows.
I use Adobe products for the time being because the other available software doesn't have the features I need quite yet. They're getting closer year by year and I could see switching being way easier once they get more feature rich. But for right now I still need Windows for my creative programs.
Yeah, that's a more likely option for me. I'm not super keen on how locked down Apple keeps the OS but MS is getting just as bad with Windows Apps and all that nonsense. So my reason for not switching to Mac is basically price of hardware at this point.
I would like to switch to Linux in the future though, not saying no, I just need my creative programs to work there and I'll be golden. Because everything else I used worked mostly okay (some hiccups but that'll happen when switching OS's).
I don’t experience any meaningful issues either using macOS. Some parts are locked down but I don’t have any issues installing apps, running brew utilities, or using third party extensions.
there are ways of running macOS on non-Apple hardware, but it requires a fair bit of tech savvy, and you usually need to build your own machine. not sure how easy it is nowadays, but i ran a macOS desktop on a PC for years without many issues. its all linux for me now, though.
Oh you mean a good old fashioned hackintosh! I'm aware, but every update seemed to be a pain in the ass (experimented with that in the past too, I have about a decade of IT experience). I'd rather just get an official Mac. The hackintosh is a cool project but not something I'd want to make a daily driver. I know some people can make it work and I'm happy for them but I found it to be too fiddly.
For anybody else interested though you can find more info at this link
Not when "Intel based Macs" go out of support. There is no way to run the M1/2 MacOS version without having Apple hardware.
yeah. the proprietary nonsense is what pushed me over to linux in the first place, and that was before they started with their super special ARM chips. RISC-V is still on the horizon, though! hopefully open source ISA will prevail in the decades to come.
Give Linux Mint a try. It is very similar to Windows and will make the transition very smooth. Pretty much any windows programs that you want to run you can run in a shell like Wine.
I like Mint and I tried Ubuntu, Debian and even Arch way back in the day just for funsies. I'm not unfamiliar with Unix based systems, I just use creative programs and that is Linux's biggest Achilles' heel. The alternatives to Adobe software just don't have the features I need yet. They're getting there but at this time it would be a rough transition.
Not sure what Adobe products you're using, or in what application, but I do photography as a hobby and do my editing on my linux machines. Rawtherapee and DarkTable are good alternatives to lightroom, with Gimp being a very good alternative to Photoshop. Gimp is getting better all the time, but Darktable already is a stronger editor than Lightroom.
Haven't tried any video editing alternatives (not my thing), but these programs have the added benefit of being free.
GIMP is still hot garbage imo, you can do a lot with it but it has a looong way to go before being comparable to Photoshop. It was only last year in 2022 they added CMYK support, that's insane to me.
I'm not saying it won't get to the feature rich state I'm looking for, but it's got a long way to go. I'm not going to be able to switch from Photoshop for a while. If I did, Affinity is a better program for that but even that is missing a lot of features in comparison. Only for now though, I'm looking forward to the future of these programs.
GIMP still doesn't have non-destructive editing; I can't imagine doing any serious image work with it. If FOSS wants a Photoshop alternative, then devs need to add more image manipulation stuff to Krita.
Made the switch 4 years ago. No regrets.
Me too.
I originally intended to do a pcie passthrough setup with a second video card and use a Windows VM for gaming, but then DXVK hit and it just wasn't necessary. The Windows games I cared about worked under Linux so I never got around to it.