548
Trump attacks judge on Truth Social moments after gag order hearing
(www.independent.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
548 points (98.4% liked)
News
23669 readers
3343 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is just to show that the judge won't put him in jail for any reason at all. Rules don't apply to the (even fake) wealthy like they do normal folk.
I am not arguing - at all - against the fundamental unfairness of the justice system, like at a foundational level. And I refuse to grant Trump even the favor of my hatred. He is as vile and wicked a creature as has ever plagued society.
But that ain't what this is about.
If you were jailed tonight, justly or not, how many would rise up in your name?
It isn't fair, but it's the reality.
The justice system should not care how big that mob is. Thats the sort of shit that destroys civilization.
There seems to be plenty of police available to shut down universities over Palestine protests, so it's not a staffing issue to put him in jail and keep the building guarded. They have plenty of shields, pepper bullets, rubber bullets, teargas, etc in case his coward supporters go for a full January 6 here. So golly gee, I just can't quite figure out what the issue is here. /s
In reality, I get it. The judge doesn't want to be in history books for putting a major presidential candidate and ex president in jail, especially just a few months before the election, especially when he really can't guarantee that person's safety. Imagine what happens if trump dies in jail. If we could trust police to be public servants rather than an organized gang engaging in racketeering against the working class as directed by the owning class, then maybe we could see proper justice.
What's maybe most frustrating is that we all see that the state can be swayed by assumed mob reactions from the right, yet the left doesn't dare weaponize those same implied threatens that we can clearly see are effective. Most cops are cowards. We are angrier and better armed than most on the right can imagine, and the system isn't sufficiently afraid of us.
It would be a kind of reversed lynch justice if the mob prevented real justice from happening. Is there a special term for it?
Maybe it's time for y'all-qeada to show its true colors.
Spoiler alert: it's yellow
I don’t hate it.
I do fully think if justice were applied equally, he’d already be in jail. And I personally think it would be sorta funny to watch the people too dumb to learn from the failed insurrection try to storm a jail belonging to one of the most violent police gangs in the U.S.
But the strategy of not giving Trump reasons to whine about unfair treatment is sound. And perhaps supporters will see he’s getting special treatment, and realize that’s another way they aren’t like him.