317

The Man Who Destroyed Google Search (www.wheresyoured.at)

submitted 7 months ago by lobut@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's a story from April, I tried seeing if it was posted before, however it's the story about how the advertising and finance team beat the search team into submission by ousting the core person protecting it to pursue "growth" and "revenue" at all costs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

I started finding DDG's results just as bad as Google's, so I switched to SearXNG and have been pretty happy with it so far.

Its open source so anyone can run an instance if they wish. I feel like this sort of model is much more resistant to enshitification.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I run a SearXNG instance myself and while it is a fine aggregator, it's important to note what it is and isn't. For instance, Sear does not have a dedicated search index and leans on third party API calls (to indexes such as the aforementioned Google and DDG listings.) This is my understanding, feel free to correct it.

For my money, I like the anonymity that Sear can afford and that it hides the AI bullshit pouring into the UIs. My son and I were talking over the weekend about how unreliable he is finding the move to AI search.

Edit: A list of public SearXNG instances for anyone that doesn't want to spin up their own.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Yes you're absolutely right. The problem of aggregators is that if all the aggregated searches go to shit, then so does it. Garbage in, garbage out.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

SearXNG is just a meta search engine. It uses Google and DDG under the hood, among others. How is it possible that it's better?

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Because the aggregated weighted result ranking provides a more useful page rank than any individual search engine, and if any search engine tries to (accidentally or otherwise) stuff specific results into the top ranks, it doesn't matter. It'll be deranked because no other engine displays those results highly. In a similar manner, it deranks targeted SEO attempts unless multiple platforms are targeted.

Don't get me wrong, it still has its problems. For example, if the individual search engines all get a bit too samey, then it will as well.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024

317 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

60148 readers

3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS