329

Seen a lot of posts on Lemmy with vegan-adjacent sentiments but the comments are typically very critical of vegan ideas, even when they don't come from vegans themselves. Why is this topic in particular so polarising on the internet? Especially since unlike politics for example, it seems like people don't really get upset by it IRL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

It's the fandom mostly. I like using Linux but I don't think you are immoral for using windows. Rick and Morty is funny but I don't think Rick is someone to take any advice from. CrossFit seems to work for most people who stick with it but it is one of many options. I won't apologize for being an atheist but I don't think you are stupid for not being one.

The problem with Veganism is the problem with monotheism. There is one proper way to live and all the others are wrong and awful.

That and the lying. I won't deny that there are farmers who abuse their animals, that is a problem that can be dealt with through the legal system, but you can't sell me a sack of lies claiming that I abused the cows I milked growing up. Because I know I didn't.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But what about disagreements that aren't just about preferences, but about right and wrong? Vegans don't view it as the type of question that's like, "Do you like Kirk or do you like Picard?" but rather as the type of question that's like, "Is it ok to beat your children?" The proper way to live is to not beat children and all other ways are wrong and awful. Framing the question as merely about individual preferences and not about morality is assuming the conclusion.

I won’t deny that there are farmers who abuse their animals, that is a problem that can be dealt with through the legal system, but you can’t sell me a sack of lies claiming that I abused the cows I milked growing up.

The legal system has no interest in addressing the vast majority of animal abuse, and there's a lot of money in it which means enough political influence to ensure that never changes. The vast majority of produced goods relies on abusive conditions. It is possible to produce animal products without abuse, but removing abuse from the system means less will be produced, which means a reduction in consumption is still necessary.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Cool thanks for confirming exactly what I was saying. Like Christianity, you can not be neutral, the doctrine doesn't allow it. You follow Jesus and go to heaven or your don't and go to hell. There is no tolerance with Veganism, there is no live and let live, there isn't even hate the sin love the sinner since you are after behavior not character or faith. One truth, with one means to truth, with one ethical system and all others have to be wrong and equally wrong.

Surprise surprise non-vegans don't particularly like being told that are on the same moral footing as children beaters. If it puts you right with your god I give you permission to compare me to one again. I won't be convinced but hey you got my permission to do it. Unlike one of us in this conversation, I can tolerate people who don't agree with me.

The legal system has no interest in addressing the vast majority of animal abuse, and there’s a lot of money in it which means enough political influence to ensure that never changes. The vast majority of produced goods relies on abusive conditions. It is possible to produce animal products without abuse, but removing abuse from the system means less will be produced, which means a reduction in consumption is still necessary.

I am sorry morality is difficult. You should file a bug report with someone who cares.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -4 points 5 months ago

Surprise surprise non-vegans don’t particularly like being told that are on the same moral footing as children beaters. If it puts you right with your god I give you permission to compare me to one again. I won’t be convinced but hey you got my permission to do it. Unlike one of us in this conversation, I can tolerate people who don’t agree with me.

The purpose of the analogy was to establish the difference between disagreements and preference and disagreements about morality, not to put you on "the same moral footing as children beaters" which is an intentional, bad faith mischaracterization. If you'll look at what I actually said:

Vegans don’t view it as the type of question that’s like, “Do you like Kirk or do you like Picard?” but rather as the type of question that’s like, “Is it ok to beat your children?"

Reading comprehension not your strong suit, I take it.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

As a thread reader here (not really contributor for this part) I see your point and I appreciate it, but I don't know if it actually helps your case?

Basically you have established a moral high-ground and visceral reaction from the perspective of the non meat eating type and I can empathize with it, but doesn't every group have this? Like if you said "Oh but it's not just about birth control it's about intentionally thwarting human life" as an argument for Catholics being against birth control... I can understand it but it isn't an argument yeah? It's an argument if I agree with your perspective, but otherwise I don't think you've done anything different than the guy you replied to from a purely argumentative standpoint: you both gave a perspective and neither of you met in the middle.

From a debate perspective he's got you by the short hairs because, even though he may not be absolutely right, you've made yourself look a little dickish to the rest of us.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 months ago

I don't see where I established a moral high ground or provoked a visceral reaction. All I did was establish that vegans see it as a moral question and not just a matter of preference.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Reading comprehension not your strong suit, I take it.

Veganism right here folks. Can't defend their argument without personal attacks. At least Christianity made some pretty looking buildings. What did your religion give to the world besides shit posts?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bad faith, however, is definitely your strong suit. Going from intentional mischaractarization into whining and playing the victim because I called you out on it is quite a skillful combo to sidetrack away from any serious discussion.

I do think that harping on this stance of "Anytime anyone says anything is bad, it's basically the same as being a religious nut job" is pretty ridiculous, so I'd advise finding a different angle next time, except that that's the only thing you've got that even resembles an argument, so idk.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

What if I told you the quiet part loud? I don't think every life is fundamentally created equal.

I'm a farm boy turned liberal and if you're going to argue about climate change and the benefits of a vegetarian diet in that respect, you've got the right of it and I'll eat less meat (I'm trying). If you're going to say "cow abuse is child abuse!" I will personally come murder a cow for you and eat it with you (or against you, I guess?).

You are barking up the wrong tree and have missed the point whenever you come to this argument. Plants and animals grown for food ARE. FOR. FOOD. and you will not turn me to your way of thinking by crying foul about their treatment. I would love to minimize animal suffering / I am not into animal torture, but you're just not going to get there unless you're literally demonstrating widespread suffering for sport of livestock animals. If there was a raccoon outside right now screwing with my dog or my kid or my house or whatever I would absolutely end it and not lose a second of sleep, without considering it's children or parentage or treatment.

I am who you are dealing with and who you are trying to convert. The "proper way to live" has nothing to do with it. I grow food, I eliminate pests, I eat the food I intended to raise. Cow, corn, pig, dog, cat, unicorn, etc: it gets to grow and flourish as much as I can provide, then it gets harvested to eat, unless it is invasive then it gets summarily removed.

It's not about callousness or disregard for the beauty of life, my situation has just been fundamentally different than yours unless you also spent childhood raising your own food.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

Do I know you?

this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
329 points (88.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35506 readers
718 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS