653
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Y’all

Rich = Full Time Employed?

You seem to mistake having a salary for having money.

America now has more than 6,000 Zoomer chief executives and 1,000 Zoomer politicians.

Also, what if you're not a CEO or a politician? Also, plus, too, how on earth is "small town city councilman" or "part-time New Hampshire legislator" a sign of wealth?

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't get the point you're trying to make with your graph. Obviously there wouldn't be many Zoomers working full time; most are still in school.

Zoomers born after 2006 haven't graduated high-school, and those born between 2002-2006 are in college. That's leaves only a 5 year window of people you'd expect to be employed full time.

The line for millenials looks about the same as Zoomers.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The line for millenials looks about the same as Zoomers.

shrug

Take that up with the Economist, its their claim and their chart.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'm trying to understand your argument against the article and what point you're trying to make by using their chart.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

The data in the article doesn't support the headline.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I can't read the entire article since it's behind a pay wall for me, but graph alone doesn't support or contradict the headline. It simply shows the full time employment of Zoomers is comparable millenials at when they were the same age. It doesn't show anything about income.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

That was one single indicator. I agree it's not the best, to your point, unemployment, homeownership, and salary averages are the ones that show middle class wealth.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I don't see any of that in the article. Is it hidden behind the paywall?

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

You just need an account for the first few articles.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
653 points (98.7% liked)

News

23684 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS