185
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 7 months ago

Why though? In case of a public chat or a chat with at least few dozens of users it'll already be excessive if it could work at all.

For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups.

Like really P2P or E2E?

Yep real P2P. The design is inspired by BitTorrent.

[-] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups.

I get that but it kind of defeats the purpose. If your group is so small that it's worth it for every member to approve new ones then it probably doesn't produce enough content for each new member to care about.

[-] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 7 months ago

See, we're already the Messenger Working Group ๐Ÿ˜‚

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
185 points (91.1% liked)

Privacy

32506 readers
1252 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS