172

I know they're supposed to be good for the environment but... God I hate those caps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I can't see how attaching them wouldn't increase the rates at which they're recycled.

You can believe this was never a problem perhaps, but then you've got to wonder why the change was made—no one is gonna profit from the design of bottle caps changing, so what's the motive for the change if it's not a problem? Contrary to the somewhat common belief, politicians tend to try and not waste time on useless legislation.

A refund system costs money, this change basically doesn't.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de -2 points 7 months ago

It was implemented as a symbol. I described it above.

The entire idea, similar to the carbon footprint, are attempts by the fossil industry to shift responsibility away from them and towards consumers. We from BP and BASF would love to stop pollution, but you guys keep throwing away the bottle caps! So they lobby the European Parliament to enact such regulations, the Parliament can act like they actually did something and the industry can keep producing plastics.

Yes, other solutions would cost more money. But these solutions would have at least a realistic chance to change something.

Remember the straight cucumber regulation? That was demanded by the retail industry. So it's not like the EU doesn't enact regulations for some lobby groups.

And if you think these caps are doing anything, the fossil industry fooled you successfully.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes I completely understand the lobbying the fossil fuel industry does and the tactics they use.

This is not the only policy from the EU regarding climate change however. If it was, I'd be with you that it's absolutely not good enough.

No one is sat thinking we've solved climate change and plastic pollution by making plastic bottle lids slightly differently, and given this thread it clearly carries a negative sentiment. So it's a pretty bad symbolic gesture.

We currently have a problem with microplastics.

I fail to see how this change will not increase the rates at which the lids are recycled.

This change was basically free, so even if it only moves the needle slightly, it was a change worth making.

There's no silver bullet for fixing the problem, pretty much everything has to change, and this is just one of those many changes.

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de -1 points 7 months ago

Ask yourself these simple questions: where is micro plastic coming from? And what would be a good lever to reduce that? Bottle caps are not the answer for any of that.

So the result is barely any change in the amount of plastic introduced in the environment, the real big sources (for example the plastic wrapper around the bottles, and around the pallets of bottles) are untouched, but people (like you) become complacent, because we added those cap straps after all!

Yes, reducing even a bit is helpful, but it's far from being free, because this exact bullshit makes people ignore the real problem. Your view is far too myopic.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

where is micro plastic coming from?

Literally everywhere

And what would be a good lever to reduce that?

Many, many, many individual pieces of legislation

Bottle caps are not the answer for any of that.

If you've read what I've written, you would know I'm not saying that

So the result is barely any change in the amount of plastic introduced in the environment

Where it ends up is the most important thing

but people (like you) become complacent, because we added those cap straps after all!

Again, read. I, or anyone else reasonable in support of this, are not saying this is the silver bullet. It's one of the thousands of points of iterative improvement we need to make.

but it's far from being free

In terms of green legislation, this is literally as cheap as it gets

this exact bullshit makes people ignore the real problem. Your view is far too myopic.

You have clearly not comprehended my previous comments remotely correctly.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
172 points (80.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35767 readers
342 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS