134
Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men (www.researchgate.net)
submitted 7 months ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/foss@beehaw.org
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] odium@programming.dev 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Perhaps ppl who keep their githubs anonymous simply tend to be more skilled. Older, more senior devs grew up in an era where social medias were anonymous. Younger, more junior devs grew up when social medias expect you to put your real name and face (Instagram, Snapchat, etc.).

More experienced devs are more likely to have their commits accepted than less experienced ones.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

18032 readers
1 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org