244
submitted 4 months ago by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

People just use the word capitalism to refer to any economic practice they don’t like.

No, detaining someone on a ship until they pay you is not capitalism. Capitalism is based on free markets. Being imprisoned on a ship isn’t a free market.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is however, a practice that results from the government being effectively corporate controlled. Which is the end result of allowing your free markets to run wild and allowing corporations to acquire that much power, money, and influence.

A pure capitalist system actively selects for this kind of bullshit. The most ruthless and unethical companies end up winning in the end. And those same companies are buying our politicians.

People blame capitalism when the system clearly favours the rich over the poor to such a dystopian extent that a man is allowed to be held hostage by a corporation

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Yes. Free markets eventually degrade into centrally-planned systems.

That does not mean that centrally-planned systems are an aspect of capitalism, any more than a pile of decaying bones is an aspect of a family pet.

Free markets degrade over time. That does not invalidate their utility; it just means they are like all other phenomena in being temporary.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

centrally-planned systems are an aspect of capitalism

Isn't that the end goal of capitalism? Winning is having control of all the capital right? How can you divorce the implied, if not explicit, end goal of a system from the system itself?

pile of decaying bones is an aspect of a family pet.

How is this not an aspect? It's the inevitable end of any living thing, much like capitalism and the heartless exploitation of literally everything

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Isn’t the goal of a soccer tournament to score goals?

No, the goal of each team, in a game, is to score goals.

The goal of the soccer tournament is to create a space in which teams of players can play soccer.

This is to answer your first question.

No the goal of capitalism is not to control the government. Even for the individual players, the goal is more like “whatever goal you want”, which is why it’s called a free market: you get to act according to your own values.

And for capitalism per se, if it has any goals, the goal is to enable people to pursue their own goals. “Capitalism” though doesn’t really have goals. It’s like “sunny weather”. Capitalism is a set of circumstances.

A government who is working to maintain a free market, which is the closest I can find to what you’re asking, has the goal of enabling success for its citizens.

Basic idea is the goal of the player is not the same as the goal of those administering the game. Dungeon Master’s goal is not to complete the quest; it’s to enable the quest.

And as an individual, my personal goal is not to control government. My goal is to provide value, and if I ruin the consent component of my business dealings, by forcing people into trades with me, then I fail at my goal because I stop getting feedback about what’s valuable.

How is this not an aspect?

I didn’t say it’s not an aspect. I said it’s no more an aspect than the bones are an aspect.

If you want to argue that a family pet is basically the same as a rock, because its final state behaves the same way as a rock, you can, but it’s a waste of energy and yields no understanding.

[-] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

All I'm getting from this is two things:

  • Free Markets need to be regulated

  • Capitalism is the process not the outcome, and you can't blame the sausage factory for making a sausage. The factory is just a set of circumstances that happens to produce sausages

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

If we’re using a factory and sausages as the analogy,

  • Capitalism is a factory that makes sausages
  • It eventually degrades into an abandoned building that produces wildlife

So yes capitalism is a process. I mean, it’s a situation where a process can take place. A free market is a situation in which free trade can take place.

Capitalism is also an outcome, of an upstream process which is establishing the free market.

Markets are naturally free when there isn’t much power differential between people, ie when coercion is difficult, expensive, and dangerous.

As civilization gets more and more advanced, the amount of power an individual or group can have over others grows, and more government input is necessary to maintain the free market.

This government activity to maintain the free market (ie prevent market domination) includes:

  • trust busting
  • truth in advertising laws
  • preventing individuals from coercing other individuals
  • punishing theft

So yes. Capitalism takes energy to maintain — again, like all things — and is a process more than an outcome. But it’s also the outcome of other processes.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
244 points (95.9% liked)

News

23200 readers
3069 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS