242
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
242 points (98.4% liked)
Enough Musk Spam
2271 readers
648 users here now
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This seems sketchy, but then again companies apparently just get to do what they want as long as they can afford enough lawyers.
Hahaha!
omg that's so much worse than just being a Tesla cuck... That's like fighting to be Elon's Bottom Bitch... These people are insane.
Lawyers aren't cheap...
Sounds like a flaw in the system that disproportionately favors the rich. Should probably do something about that.
From "Elon's Bottom Bitch" to "poor victim of the system" eh?
No, the fact they're not choosing to fight while having enough money to throw at Tesla makes them a Bottom Bitch.
The system making expensive lawsuits one of the only ways to restitution is the victim part. Please learn nuance before making smartass insults that don't even make sense.
I suppose I should expect this type of response from someone who is willing to victim-blame consumers because of the company they chose to purchase from.
Oh nonono, they aren't a victim for buying a cybertruck. The problems with Tesla and Musk have been obvious for years by now.
The fact you do not understand being a responsible purchaser when spending SIX FIGURES leads me to believe you're biased towards stupid decisions yourself. I'm sorry, but this person has made an unequivocally stupid purchase, and then doesn't want to fight getting fucked by the rich troll...
If you want to die on the hill of defending someone making repeatedly poor decisions, be my guest.
Two things can be true at the same time. You know that, right? Also, that’s a bit of a misrepresentation.
…and he might have alimony payments to worry about in the near future. Perhaps child support, too.
How is that even remotely enforceable?
It may not be, but it worked on this guy though intimidation since he isn't going to contest it.
In most jurisdictions such a clause would be downright illegal and thus completely void.
Yeah, but he lives in Utah, so...
Good, you see what I tried to imply here.