437
submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onihikage@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can still do that by adopting kids someone else made. No sense adding to the population when some kids already don't have parents.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

yup. there are HEAPS of loving kids needing homes. There's no need to add to an overpopulation already when there are so many kids needing homes already.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What overpopulation are you talking about?

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

You make a good point but then again, the numbers game would still be tilted in favor of those who multiply the most.

Why not have 1 child and adopt another, preferably of the same age so that both children won't be lonely and have someone to depend on as family when the parents are gone.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

there's nothing that says you can only adopt one kid :)

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
437 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22100 readers
180 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS