451
submitted 3 months ago by makeasnek@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 97 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.

Source: trust me bro >.>

Rules for thee and not for me.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago

Just remember "terrorism" is a generic term these days. Russia invaded Ukraine over "terrorism."

It wouldn't shock me if they started carefully monitoring political views to detect anything the state doesn't like.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago
[-] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago
[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Protecting children has never been an intention or an outcome with these laws.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
451 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

31566 readers
763 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS