843
submitted 5 months ago by btaf45@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 99 points 5 months ago

Here's your bumper sticker..

No Kings, Vote Biden

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well to be fair, it'd be King Biden.

Just a far less scary king who might even work to unking himself.

Or something idk.

This shits scary.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago

Exactly this. It’s critically important that we prevent trump and his fascist goons from getting control of this power. But that in itself doesn’t address the really big problem here. Living at the whim of a benevolent king is still living under a king. I honestly think this is it. The constitutional republic is over in every meaningful way beyond window dressing. Given the authority of the Supreme Court, I don’t see a legal fix for this. This is dark AF.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This ruling basically covered how ex-Presidents might be prosecuted. The President still has some level of accountability to Congress via impeachment , although we've already seen how hard that is.

Of course, when Trump's second impeachment didn't stick, one of the main reasons Republicans gave for voting against it was that they felt the proper venue for that was in the courts. Now that it is in court, the Supreme Court just said "Sike! Congress needed to act all along".

Edited to add: Another legal fix would be simply packing the court. Democrats should pound this during this election. They should make sure voters know that if Democrats are given the White House and both houses of Congress, they will fix the court by adding 4 new seats.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

one of the main reasons Republicans gave for voting against it was that they felt the proper venue for that was in the courts.

The courts that they knew they had stacked in their favor. That was always an intentional copout.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

Watching a panel of news anchors discuss this today, I was struck by the ashen looks on their faces. As if they had today witnessed a mortal wound to the nation.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 16 points 5 months ago

I don't know. Something tells me that they don't have the integrity left to hold their own rulings true for the group of people that they don't personally support.

I'm getting more of a "rules for thee but not for me" vibe but from the supreme Court

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It's not in human nature to limit your own power. I'm voting for Biden, for his appointments and admin, I have nothing against him, but my experience is that no one relinquishes power. Once the office has the power, no one's going to let it go.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Vote King Joe I

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I mean, who has a better story than Biden?

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Have you seen the interviews with them? They literally want him to be king. They say yes when asked if he should be dictator.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Great. Let's put him and Castro in crowns on billboards and stick them in Miami. Let them look at them for awhile.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The irony that Cuban refugees vote for the racist because he's "not the dictator"

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

First of all, they aren't monolithic. Young Cubans vote differently than old Cubans. But, Rick Scott has the formula...no matter the subject call your opponent a socialist. They hate socialism...but always want strongman rule.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[-] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

Biden is the current God King and apart from a 2 minute speech he ain't doing much about it

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
843 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3752 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS