153
submitted 5 months ago by Kwakigra@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Speaks for itself. We've been beyond satire for a long time but this one still got me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

Their ruling isn't new law, it's telling people what the law already said. Even all the stuff they made up along the way.

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 10 points 5 months ago

And the definition of "official" is so gray it could be anything and not anything! Gotta love vauge interpretations from what is supposed to be our finest judges.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago

I particularly like that they hinted that some things in the trial were official and some things weren't, but they're not going to tell anyone what they are at this time, we have to wait for the appeal to work its way back up. At which point the election will be over and they'll just say "psyche, it's all official".

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

But even when prosecuting the pres for unofficial acts nothing involved in committing any official acts can be used as evidence in court.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10192 readers
41 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS