293
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 102 points 5 months ago

At a range, sure. At home, sure. On the street, sure.

On a movie set, with someone who's entire job it is to make sure this shit doesn't happen handing it to you? No

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago

The friction is that Alec is not just an actor on that set, he's also a producer so he has extra responsibilities.

But in that case, the cops and prosecutors fucked up and the judge has taken the right course of action as prescribed by the courts.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago

Producers should have zero input on this. "I put money into this film. I insist on being allowed to play with every firearm on set" is patently stupid.

Their responsibilities begin and end with ensuring that people have been hired to be responsible for that. They did. Those people were (in my opinion) criminally negligent. But (if memory serves) the AD almost immediately turned and begged for a deal and the armorer makes the average gravy seal look intelligent. Which, like most of these tragic and pointless deaths, speaks more toward industry wide accreditation and vetting processes.

Because, again, just because someone has money doesn't mean they understand gun safety. And the last thing we want is someone who played Call of Duty while getting a blowie last night insisting they know better.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I think the only nuance I would make is that the investigation should determine if Alec Baldwin, the producer, did his due diligence with the responsibilities that he has on set.

I did not follow the trial, so I don't know what has been done in this case.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

The friction is that Alec is not just an actor on that set, he’s also a producer so he has extra responsibilities.

This is true, but I don't think it's a producer's responsibility to check if a gun is loaded with real ammo or not.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

No, but there is a point to be debated that if you hire an incompetent person that kills someone on your set, you could face consequences.

But yes, I agree with you, this isn't the producer's job to check if a gun is loaded with real ammo or not.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee -5 points 5 months ago

The friction is that Alec is not just an actor on that set, he’s also a producer so he has extra responsibilities.

Yes.

But in that case, the cops and prosecutors fucked up and the judge has taken the right course of action as prescribed by the courts.

No. If the prosecutors fucked up on an otherwise valid case, discipline them and retry the case. Regardless or innocence or guilt, everyone should have a fair trial.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

That's how the court system works. A fair trial also means for the accused. Otherwise, nothing stops the prosecutors of binding the accused in the court system until he runs out of money.

The moment that the prosecution kept an evidence from the defense, the trial wasn't fair for the accused.

I get the frustration, but the other way around opens up the court system for a lot more abuse than we see now.

If you want to argue about changing the court system, I agree with you, but it is out of scope for that case.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
293 points (97.7% liked)

News

23655 readers
4716 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS