288
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 71 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Learning about Vance over the last few days has been intriguing (I didn't even know he existed until a couple of weeks ago).

The overall impression I get...

Imagine that for every situation an individual is in, there's a number of different lines of dialogue they can choose (like a romance game).

Then imagine that each response is labeled - there's the kind response or the strong response or the selfish response or the funny response or whatever.

It's as if in essentially every single situation, regardless of any other factors, J.D Vance chooses the asshole response.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

The dialogue setup in the video game Fallout is exactly this. Just a useless tidbit for those who don't know.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I was thinking exactly this, lol

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Whenever you're asked for help you get the option of yes, yes, sarcastic yes, and not yet but it'll be a yes later.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And every once in a while, you get the, “I know we were just trying to murder each other, but have you thought about a relationship?” options, which can be interesting when you find out the apocalypse made everyone bisexual, including the robots

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Of course this is mostly a 3D Fallout issue. Fallout and Fallout 2 had more intricate dialogues, Fallout Tactics isn't an RPG, and Brotherhood of Steel is obviously perfect and doesn't have any issues.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

This sounds more like Starfield.

Do you wish to say: yes, snarky yes, aloof yes, or ok fine

[-] nao@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Wasn’t JD Vance a Fallout character?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I thought fallout characters had better writing.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

He's one of those Fallout 2 NPCs that only has floating dialogue.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Worse, he is a Fallout Tactics random stop NPC.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

So absolutely identical to Trump? I get why he was picked now.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Vance was picked because he is Peter Thiel’s little bitch, and Thiel is Musk’s bitch. No other reason.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
288 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19026 readers
2395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS