752
submitted 5 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

THE SENATE UNANIMOUSLY passed a bipartisan bill to provide recourse to victims of porn deepfakes — or sexually-explicit, non-consensual images created with artificial intelligence

The legislation, called the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act — passed in Congress’ upper chamber on Tuesday.  The legislation has been led by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), as well as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in the House.

The legislation would amend the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to allow people to sue those who produce, distribute, or receive the deepfake pornography, if they “knew or recklessly disregarded” the fact that the victim did not consent to those images.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 142 points 5 months ago

Unanimously

While I think 'deepfake porn is bad' is pretty uncontroversial, I'm surprised not one senator decided to vote nay just to spite AOC.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago

Because the headline is misleading. The bill was written by a bipartisan group of democrats and republicans, including AOC.

It’s weird to call it AOC’s bill in this context.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 37 points 5 months ago

It would not be nearly the first time that Republicans shot down their own bill for no reason other than some Democrats said it was a good bill.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 11 points 5 months ago
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Clue in the one guy that doesn't please?

[-] grozzle@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

i'm guessing because she's the only senator with a notable quantity of deepfake porn made of her.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

She isnt a senator though, unless I missed something?

[-] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Bills start in the House before they are passed to the Senate. My guess would be that she championed it through the House, and then passed it off to the Senators mentioned to continue shepherding the legislation to the President's desk.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It can go both ways. Some start in the house, some the senate. They need to be approved by both, but the process isn’t unidirectional.

[-] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Wow, today I learned! Thanks for the info. It turns out a half remembered episode of Schoolhouse Rock seen 30 years ago is not the authoritative source on the legislative info.

Unfortunately, that is not stopping me for hearing, "I'm just a bill, sitting on Capitol Hill" ad nauseum in my head lol

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 4 points 5 months ago

Not the only one with a "notable quantity", but certainly the only one with content which could be regarded as "contextually appropriate".

If your sexual proclivity errs on the side of old and/or stupid politicians, then I apologise for calling your preferences "contextually inappropriate"

It's like watching the Teletubbies during an orgy; sure, someone might be into it, but I'm quite sure most people would say the Teletubbies is not something they want to watch while turning your favourite primary school teacher pink.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

She isn't one, but she will be. A senator I mean.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago

I dunno, i've seen lots of Kamala deepfakes flooding the internet since her run was announced.

VP is functionally essentially a senator with extra privilages

[-] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

VP is functionally essentially a senator with extra privilages

But seemingly less power and influence somehow

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I get it now, thanks for the explanation!

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Say that to my petabyte-sized collection of Lindsay Graham tickle porn.

[-] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For republicans, aoc is the face of the liberal woke boogeyman. It doesn't matter what she says or does, it's automatically terrible. All news media gives her way more attention than is warranted bc they like to capitalize on hype.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

I'm guessing "defending nonconsensual porn" seemed like something you wouldn't want on your record and in attack ads even for the troglodytes.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 5 months ago

Once it gets to a vote, yes. The way to kill these things is to bury it in procedure and pretend you're just doing due diligence. Still pretty amazing that it got this far.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

These guys are tripping over each other to gargle the orange balls of a bitch who openly professes lust for his daughter.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I don't think he puts the fake tan all over. Occasionally, he doesn't even get to the hair line.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/02/trump-real-photo-orange-tan-skin.html

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 9 points 5 months ago

I'm surprised from the other side, there's always people defending deepfake porn on Lemmy

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Its a 1st ammendment issue to me.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
752 points (98.6% liked)

News

23655 readers
3763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS