1102
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

If they want to have a future, a lot more of them should get to feeling zero "meh" about voting for not donnie.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

They just showed the party what to do in order to get them excited to vote.

The party listened to their concerns, and they fell in line instantly. All the party has to do to get voter enthusiasm is to listen to the voters.

You don't get enthusiasm by ignoring people's concerns. That's how you get apathy and resentment.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm sure it has a bit to do with voters being especially loud about this issue.

I know I wrote both my dem senators (Warren and Market), my dem rep, and my dem governor (Healey), asking them to support Biden resigning a couple days after the debate. And I'm probably not alone on that.

[-] KevinAteMyPieIn1993@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I mean, political donors pulling support of Biden after the debate did grease the wheels for that transition.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Yes, but look at what his exit accomplished. All the people who were saying that we should ignore the concerns of young people because they don't vote? Welp, young people are getting excited to vote because their concerns have been heard and addressed.

Compare this to where they were when Biden was refusing to step down.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Yes, I get why the party did what it did. Still - voting for someone based solely on something like age and color, when the alternative is donnie, is exceedingly reckless.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Do you think that's the reason? They're more likely to vote because the party abandoned its all too usual "Here's the candidate we like. Fuck you, you're voting like we tell you to because you have no choice lol." messaging.

Morale matters.

Do what the voters want and they'll vote for you. Not the ass-backwards "vote in perfect lockstep for us forever no matter what we do, and maybe someday we'll think about starting the process of evaluating giving tentative consideration to half a baby step towards something tangentially related to what you want, implemented over the course of 10 years" that was centrist conventional foolishness since at least 1992.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

You could argue the same thing about Kamala. Maybe even more so, to be honest.

I wanted Biden to step aside as well, but mostly because of the optics and narrative about "Biden so old" and low information voters like this.

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

Young people don't understand voter disenfranchisement, voter suppression, erosion of constitutional rights etc.

They just understand

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah I'm sure the party that brought them in the situation they are in to begin with is their only hope for a future. It definitely represents them and their interests and not the billionaires, hence not addressing any of the real pressing issues in the world that the new generation cares about.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

That's a funny have hat you have. I've got a grey one I cut the label off. Refuse to be owned like that. You shouldn't be owned by someone. Make your way free. It's a fight. I tell you this with love.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Not sure I understand what you are saying here.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Sorry! I poisoned myself on accident and was talking out of my head. Sorry if I caused offense.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
1102 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS