855
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] style99@lemm.ee 174 points 5 months ago

Kamala should really be doing much better going against a despicable convicted rapist and a couch fucker.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 143 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

She will be.

I'm increasingly confident about a blue wave this election. First multiracial female president in a time when bodily autonomy is under attack.

And that's all without taking into account who and what she is running against.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 86 points 5 months ago

Don’t get overconfident. Remember to vote!

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 32 points 5 months ago

Can't have a blue wave without a blue vote.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 5 months ago

Remind yourself that overconfidence is a slow and insidious killer.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I was told fear is the little death that will bring total obliteration and so far that seems to be holding true.

[-] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 68 points 5 months ago

Biden should have done better. Anyone who is not a rapist felon should be doing better.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 63 points 5 months ago

It's insane how much of politics comes down to ~vibes~. Yeah Biden was too old, but I still can't fathom how many were ready to let Trump win just because voting for a tired grandpa "didn't feel good".

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

America is increasingly an aesthetic country IMO.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

America is increasingly an ignorant country IMO. Probably because half of our politicians are actively trying to dismantle public education.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The exasperating part is that the aesthetics of a hellscape running under the thumb of these radically right wing creeps and weirdoes will some of the very worst...

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, I'm partially referring to the dichotomy Kierkegaard lays out in Either/Or between an aesthetic life and an ethical one. It's clear to me that we discarded the possibility of ethics a few decades ago.

But then I'm also referring to what you're talking about and I totally agree that the fascist aesthetics are terrible as well.

However, they're also increasingly popular for some reason...cars that look like they'll be used exclusively for transport to a black site, hideous people deforming themselves with clownish cosmetic procedures, every iteration of an American flag except the regular one, the fucking cyber truck...there are more examples...fucking ick.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Well it always comes down to the margins.

Most voters just always vote the same way because it's how their parents voted. Sad, but true. Then you have a band of voters that actually will vote based on the party platforms and the track record of who's running. But all of these voters are easy to predict, set the platform accordingly and you know how many votes to expect. And that's not a bad thing if an issue is important to voters and the politicians know this and can get those votes by promising to do something about it and have a fairly good track record on fulfilling their promises, everything goes smoothly.

But then you're left with a small percentage of people who will vote based on who they'd like to have a beer with, which one is more handsome, which one reminds them of one of their relatives or whatever.

It comes down to the margins, and the margins are random as fuck.

[-] USSMojave@startrek.website 23 points 5 months ago

Since her campaign is only a week old, it will take some time for polling to catch up, but hopefully not much longer 🤞

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a 1970s small venue wrestling tag team

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, but the side kick keeps hitting the opponent with couch cushions instead of steel chairs and that's not very effective.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

that's not very effective

Speak for yourself 💎💎🤤

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Don't forget about the whole "probably a pedophile who wanted to fuck his daughter since she was a child"

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I'm just curious but where did the couch fucker thing come from because I saw memes of it on lemmy but don't know where it came from

[-] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Apparently Trump's vp pick has a book where he discussed sex with furniture.

[-] LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml -4 points 5 months ago

The rapist is pretty much confirmed but I doubt that someone ever fucked a couch. Not even I fucked a couch, so I am sceptical.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, the couch-fucking is a bogus story. You don't need to make up embarrassing shit about JD Vance. There's plenty of it that's true. And there will be more coming out as the campaign progresses.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
855 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS