536
submitted 4 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 206 points 4 months ago

They should try making good coffee

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 96 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The coffee is okay, but nowhere close to the price they're asking for.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

The price is especially not worth it when they support Israel and mistreat their workers.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 4 months ago

The pricing is also egregious considering I can make a far better cup at home for less.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 78 points 4 months ago

You'll always make a better cup of coffee at home for less.

But people pay a little extra for the convenience of not doing it. Starbucks however is banking on their reputation to overcharge, which seems to be finally backfiring.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 37 points 4 months ago

The coffee is better at home, sure. But I can't make what is essentially a specialty milkshake at home without going out and getting the tools and ingredients.

Sometimes I can have little a of Starbucks, as a treat.

[-] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 6 points 4 months ago

I just found a local place that makes a bomb chocolate coffee shake (I mean uhh. A blended mocha) and support them.

The worst part is that I can get Starbucks anywhere but only get my local stuff near home.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 2 points 4 months ago

In my town one of the two coffee shops closed down but they opened like 4 more Starbucks, we have 4 within a quarter mile on the same street it's wild

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

I will never understand people who get drip coffee at Starbucks... back when I got things from there it would just be the occasional over the top milk shake. Starbucks legitimately has the tools to produce ridiculous drinks with far less hassle then it'd take at home.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

It's like drinking Bud Light at a bar. The beer isn't the product, the venue is.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah the only Starbucks in my area I'll go into is the reserve but that's because it's just really cool in there. If I want a busy environment that feels like a steampunk world then it's the place to be. Coffee there still sucks tho and even with the cool location I'm still only in there maybe a couple times a year

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I avoid Starbucks for all kinds of reasons but can't say it's 100% abstention. Sometimes it's just a little too convenient for that overpriced slop. Sometimes called Charbucks because of how the coffee is always burnt.

[-] Feelfold@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

I don't like candy bars or milkshakes. If I'm going to a Starbucks its at 3am in an airport, it's the ONLY option, thus I'm willing to tolerate burnt to fuck drip coffee.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Is their coffee much more than $2? Last I remember, it wasn’t THAT expensive considering it isn’t shit coffee like a Burger King/McDonalds or etc.

Or by drip do you mean their like clover machine fancy coffees? I never bothered with those so idk how much that was.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

McDonalds coffee is decent, at least in Canada.

Tim Horton's terrible.

[-] astanix@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

2.95 for a default size black coffee at the one closest to me right now

[-] littletoolshed@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Ok but what is the default size? And where-ish are you? In the Starbucks app, it defaults to Grande for me and that is $3.45.

A Tall is $3.25.

A Short is $3.15.

This is in Northern California.

[-] astanix@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Grande, northeast Ohio

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

That’s… not true. I have zero coffee making skills and tools.

[-] Aussiemandeus@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

A kettle and some instant coffee, better then any coffee I've ever had from a shop

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No not always. I knew this Turkish immigrant who had his own little coffee shop you could not make close to the stuff he made let me tell you. God I miss him.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 23 points 4 months ago

They make desserts using coffee as an ingredient. That's why their coffee is shit at being coffee.

Vanilla makes a pancake delicious, but you wouldn't drink it.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 9 points 4 months ago

but you wouldn't drink it.

Hey I had to try it at least once!

(Also: at most once)

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] noxy@yiffit.net 3 points 4 months ago

I resent you for the bad taste now in my mouth, but I thank you for giving me an excuse to break from doomscrolling :P

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

You just didn't drink enough

[-] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Try vanilla bean paste if you haven't - its actually good unlike the extract. Extract tastes bad because of concentration of cheap vodka, and paste has more vanilla so there's less vodka per volume.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago
[-] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There was an article during the convention that listed supporters. I'll look for it.

ETA- my mistake. It was a fake that was shared on Facebook and Twitter. It must have been here too because i don't have Twitter and my Facebook is only cats and relatives.

[-] DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Starbucks does not directly support the RNC. But that doesn't mean that Starbucks' lobbying money doesn't primarily support Republicans. Per the PDF you linked, the majority of Starbucks' contributions to lobbying organizations went to those that donate at least 75% of their lobbying to Republicans.

From your link: National Restaurant Association: 75% of all donations to Republicans; 50% of Starbucks' donations to this organization went to lobbying Business Roundtable: "75 percent of donations from the median chief executive were directed to Republicans"; 40% of Starbucks' donations to this organization went to lobbying

Edit: Added the word "lobbying" before "money" in the first paragraph. Should have been in the original.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

My sister used to manage a coffee shop and says they would never hire former Starbucks employees because they are trained to make it very poorly.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Also, good pastries again.

The good cafes next to me all have fresh baked pastries from a local bakery. Not Starbucks. 7-11 has better food than Starbucks.

[-] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

They never will though. Recently, they had "expert tasters" test how long their espresso shots tasted good, and their result was that "Starbucks espresso shots last up to 90 seconds." This just so happened to take place right as they started introducing a new system on how to sequence drinks while on the espresso and cold beverage bars lol.

(Also, as a footnote, Espresso shots die after 5-10 seconds; the crema just dissipates after then, making the shot taste acidic)

[-] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

So, off topic, but are you saying that I’m to drink a scalding hot, freshly pulled shot within 10 seconds!?

[-] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Not exactly? Traditionally, it's served in a 2oz cup and you would slurp it to coat your tongue and get all the flavors while not outright burning your tongue. Over at Starbucks however, we tend to pour steamed milk or ice on top to shock the shots and make them stay at one taste. A good example is a plain iced doppio espresso: it's just ice poured over two shots, with sugar, syrup, and cream to preference.

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

(Also, as a footnote, Espresso shots die after 5-10 seconds; the crema just dissipates after then, making the shot taste acidic)

Espresso shots "dying" within 10 seconds is a myth, apparently started by Starbucks' training funnily enough. The flavour of a shot definitely dies down as it gets cooler and the crema dissipates, but it's a matter of minutes rather than seconds before a shot tastes bad.

Heck it takes more than 10 seconds to get the drink to the clients in every café I've worked in. If espresso dies after 10 seconds, I have never served a good espresso. I've also apparently never had good espresso at work, because I swear every damn time I pull a shot for myself a client comes right in before I can take a sip :P

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

When I read that comment the first time, I misunderstood, and thought they were saying espresso was over-extracted after 10s, dead after 90.

I know starbucks isn't amazing, but 90s extractions would be a whole other ballgame!

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

When your coffee tasting notes are "burned, charcoal, ash", and you make up for it by offering £7 worth of sugar, it's not surprising when people only shop there for so long.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
536 points (97.3% liked)

News

23655 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS