2088

uBlock Origin developer recommends switching to Firefox as Chrome flags the extension (github.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

265 comments fedilink hide all child comments

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 81 points 4 months ago

I recommend switching to another browser like Firefox or Librewolf.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I love Librewolf currently but I worry it's going to stray too much from what it originally was like Waterfox and others ended up doing, and then end up randomly breaking compatibility with certain plugins or introducing other issues.

Right now, Librewolf is the best way to experience Firefox. Will that still be the case in 5, 10, 15 years? That remains to be seen. I hope it's still the best way to experience Firefox years from now. Having to change browsers every so often does suck tbh.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Those are jumping to Librewolf from Firefox, keep the following things in mind

It's a privacy first, usability second browser
It's not a browser for your grandparents. You have you take some steps to give it the same functionality as Firefox
Good news is it removes a lot of Mozilla cruft
Browser fingerprinting, which allows websites to recognize an individual user, is disabled on this browser. This feature greatly enhances privacy.
But it means it will 'slightly' break some websites. Nothing very serious but certain QoL features will be missing at first. Eg. When downloading a software, it can't determine which OS you are using.
You can enable browser fingerprinting and get those QoL features back.

Hope you have a good experience on Librewolf. I've been using it for the past 1 year and it's fine.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

Meh.

Librewolf already breaks loads of websites with it's fingerprinting resistance - just get used to turning it off.

In any case, you already need a chromium fork handy for all the sites that just plain don't support firefox any more. I've run in to weird issues in firefox that don't arise in chromium several times in the last month. This is going to get much worse.

As for changing browsers. I don't care very much. I don't use many browser features like bookmarks or passwords.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Which websites did you run into issues with Firefox? I haven't had any issues with any websites. I do think you're right that it's probably going to get worse over time, but maybe not if more people make the switch to Firefox.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

booking.com is the worst I've encountered. There's a captcha type anti-bot thing that I can't pass with firefox. I think it uses canvas.

edit: another I use all the time is called echo360. It's the platform my university uses to host lecture videos. The player just plain doesn't work in firefox - blank screen.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Using firedragon for desktop (Linux) and between iceraven and mull for mobile

[-] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 months ago

hello, i have chosen to value your opinion above my own based on very shaky reasoning i will not be sharing

I abandoned chrome for being too RAM-hungry when im playing games w the browser open

i abandoned Internet Explorer for being too slow

and i abandoned firefox for being too bloated and sluggish, but that was like 2010 and things change

im currently using Opera but why do you choose firefox over its contemporaries?

[-] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago

Because it’s not based on chromium(blink web engine), there are two other well supported web engines which browsers can be based on, WebKit (Apple), and Gecko (Mozilla).

At the end of the day, if it’s built on Blink, it’s liable to have Google break things they don’t like on the back end. Including ad blockers.

Opera used to be built on it’s own web engine (presto) but since 2013 it’s been built on Blink.

[-] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

that was a great summary, thank you

trying to research such a broad topic was overwhelming

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Firefox is open source and Opera is still based on Chromium (the engine for Chrome, same as Edge and a number of other browsers).

For practical use, Firefox seems plenty fast on my devices including mobile.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024

2088 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60112 readers

1924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS