639
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

As the vice president introduced her new running mate at an energetic rally in Philadelphia, he quickly demonstrated his ability to deliver searing attacks against Donald Trump and JD Vance.

America’s introduction to Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota began with a half-hour of cheering for Vice President Kamala Harris and ended with some of the sharpest attacks Democrats have leveled against former President Donald J. Trump and his running mate, Senator JD Vance of Ohio.

Before a raucous crowd in Philadelphia, Ms. Harris and Mr. Walz presented the Minnesotan as a folksy former schoolteacher and football coach who had inspired his students, served in the military and improved his constituents’ lives.

But it was his ability to deliver searing yet accessible attacks against their Republican opponents that won Mr. Walz a place on the national ticket, and during his first rally, he did not miss his marks.

“Donald Trump sees the world a little differently than us,” he said. “First of all, he doesn’t know the first thing about service. He doesn’t have time for it because he’s too busy serving himself.”

Then came the dagger. “Violent crime was up under Donald Trump,” he said, before pausing for effect. “That’s not even counting the crimes he committed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

It's a shame he's a teetotaler now, he has the highest "I could have a beer with him" score of any candidate I've ever seen.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

He can just be the "I could have a root beer with him" candidate then.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago

Yeah. Actually he seems like he'd be totally okay with you having a beer

[-] ech@lemm.ee 27 points 4 months ago

Learn to hang out with people without alcohol involved instead of treating their choice to not drink as a problem.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It was a reference to the type of appeal that the media made a big deal about George W. Bush having. Learn to let a joke go by without seizing the opportunity to talk down to someone.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

I'd have a nonalcoholic beer with him any time!

They actually make a lot of REALLY tasty ones now, which makes my life as a beer-loving ex-drinker a LOT easier when there's a football game on, for example 😁

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Ooh, what's your favorites? I'm not a teetotaler, but I don't sleep as well after drinking so most of the time I'd rather just have an NA beer. I've never been a fan of IPAs, unfortunately, so I'm pretty meh on most of Athletic's offerings. My favorite is from a local brewery (Bauhaus Brew Labs) called Nah, it's a non alcoholic Helles.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm not a fan of overly hoppy beers (of which IPAs are the worst by definition) either heh.

I can't recommend the nonalcoholic versions of Leffe Blonde or Brune highly enough!

They taste exactly like the "normal" version, which is high praise if you ask me. So if you like Belgian Trappist style beer and don't want the alcohol, those are definitely the way to go IMO.

If you're more into a refreshing wheat beer, the Kronenbourg 1664 Blanc 0.0% will do you well too, my absolute favorite for a hot summer day!

If you just want a regular pilsner that doesn't cost too much but is still hella tasty, my favorite "daily driver" is Bavaria nonalcoholic.

I hope any or all of these are available in your area and to your taste!

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

I was really disappointed with the NA beer in California when I visited. Athletic had three types that were stocked in the various grocery stores I visited, but they all tasted exactly the same.

There was an NA Mango that I saw in one but nowhere else. Surprising really when we can get Brooklyn Special Effects over here in the UK. I was expecting at least a match in options.

Good luck with your hunt!

[-] ReCursing@lemmings.world 6 points 4 months ago

I tend to find nonalcoholic beers taste a bit... thin. I tend to go for a bitter (I'm British, there's a load of really good traditional regional bitters about) rather than an IPA or wheatbeer, or anything else. Do you find that and just don't mind or am I just drinking the wrong things?

(I'm not tee total, I just don't drink much cos I'm usually driving)

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Some cheap ones are, sure, but a good nonalcoholic beer tastes like a good beer WITH alcohol does. I haven't tried one myself yet as they aren't in stores here, but apparently a Guinness 0.0 tastes exactly like the classic alcoholic stout.

As for bitters specifically, duckduckgo keeps giving me cocktail bitters even when I limit my search to the UK and specify "English Bitter" "best bitter" or "bitter beer" 🤦

[-] ReCursing@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago

I'll take another look then. Thanks.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

No problem 🙂

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They can be a bit thinner, but considering how much Neck Oil is in your face I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Its more the lagers that just taste of malt juice that I dislike.

If you want stuff that isnt thin then Laser Crush by Beavertown is pretty good, and Special Effects by Brooklyn is amazing considering its 0.5%. (IMHO).

Both can be picked up at either Tescos or Sainsburys.

And as mentioned, Guinness 0.0 tastes the same. I've had that a few times at Twickenham, and its just as good but it could have been the atmosphere.

What surprised me more was that I was recently out in California, and most supermarkets I visited either didn't have an option or only had one Athletic, which you can get in Tescos but is probably one of the weaker IPA options.

[-] ReCursing@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

I'll have to go to Sainsburys and see if I can grab some of one of those two then. And you're the second (third?) person to mention Guineess 0,0 so I'll give that a go too - stout isn't my favoruite but it's far from the worst

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

Another thought is the Big Drop Paradiso Citra, which is not quite as good as the other two, is still very nice and I'm not sure about Saintsbury's, but I can get it in my local Tescos.

I'm not a big fan of the other Big Drops, but the Citra is nice when the sun is out.

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I wouldn't normally choose stout. I picked it because it was going to be first drink of the day during a longer hot spell.

Turned out surprising good.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I'd have rated Al Franken higher but he's pretty much left politics for good at this point.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago

He runs a weekly political podcast at least

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
639 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS