342
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
342 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19246 readers
2499 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Definition of “enemy of my enemy” because they’re still delusional about this concept of “the good republican” as they harken back to the more buttoned up Romney approach, but whatever. Clearly they are getting under his skin and that’s a good thing
There's Republicans that believe in democracy and align themselves with US interests. They've been pushed out of the party for not supporting fascism but I never had to question if Romney, McCain or Kasich were working for Russians or Saudis.
McCain will never be ok with me after “bomb bomb bomb Iran! 🎶”
That generation of republicans consisted of countless warmongers.
That's fine, but the above comment is true.
You think bain capital is free of Saudi blood money? Are you daft or just 12?
Still doesn't make it a wrong statement. McCain was a war hawk, and flawed in many ways, but to suggest they were not seeking American interests is simply untrue.
Save the childish name-calling, it does nothing here.
I dunno, maybe if they larp it hard enough they actually will become good people.
There used to be decent republicans in office; I’m old enough to remember some of them. Our former state treasurer was pretty awesome, for example. Sadly, even his daughter has been bit by the looney republican bug. So now we have a democrat in that position.
Honestly I want to agree with you. I think lemmy is making me a little too cynical.
let_them_fight.gif
oh i don't know anything about them, is the Lincoln project republican?
I'm assuming not, but I'm just looking for some context for your comment.
why is the Lincoln project your enemy?
Like others have said, very much "enemy of my enemy" thing. Old school republicans, Rick Wilson for example worked on George H.W. Bush's campaign.
I love what they're doing getting under Trump's skin, but once he's no longer a threat they'll return to being the enemy. For the moment we can enjoy their work, though.
jesus, okay. thanks. HW, gross.
guess i have to listen to the "know your enemy" podcast instead.
The latest episode was a great interview about the hollowing-out of the parties.
I've had it in my feed for a while, but I'm still listening to so many others that I haven't started listening to "know your enemy" yet.
but i will, I listen to 5-4 a lot and whenever they guest on that it's very informative.
Yes it's led by four veteran Republicans.
okay, thank you
Yeah harkening back to the fact that Lincoln was a Republican. Their raison d’être is “we need to destroy Trump to make way for the good republicans,” they aren’t liberal/leftist by any stretch.
But they are, at least, a useful idiot in this case.
The useful idiots are the Dems who donate to this group. Sure, they're a thorn in Trump's side but they're also doing very nicely out of this hustle.
ohhh got it, thanks.
Okay, cut the cult of Trump out of the GOP, and what are you left with?
A party that wants to cut taxes on the rich, privatize public services (read: funnel tax money to the rich), privatize education (read: funnel tax money to the rich while removing education from the poor at the same time), ban women from getting abortions, infect what remains of the government with Christofascistism, shove the LGBTQ movement either in the closet or out a window, stuff the judiciary with unqualified partisans who issue rulings based on conservative ideology instead of sound jurisprudence, and roll back all progress made against the wealthy for the last hundred years. All of these policies predate Trump by decades, and he is more than happy to enforce these policies as long as he can enrich himself while doing so.
You know all the noise that's being made about Project 2025 and how borderline treasonous it is? Trump had nothing to do with it- the think tanks that wrote it basically just compiled a wish-list of conservative policies, and are just waiting for the next Republican president to enact it. It's much like the US/Soviet Union at the end of WWII- we're happy to have their help against the greater threat, but that doesn't make them not a threat themselves that need to be dealt with.
Yes, the Lincoln project exists to make people forget how bad regular republicans are because they're also against the fascist orange asshole.
Yes, the Lincoln project is old school Republican