388

My wife, newly hired, was asked to un-blur her camera during a routine meeting to confirm her I9 information. This seems like a violation to me? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by shalafi@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

She had interviewed and met both remotely and in person, this guy was merely an HR drone confirming her documentation. I was a little bent when she told me he had asked her to remove her blur filter "to have a look at her working environment, make sure it's not cluttered" (something along those lines). No one else at this company requested such. Was he way out of line?

I should note, this is my PC in our living room and not where she will be working from. And this guy wants a look around our home?! Told my wife to bring this up once she's settled in, ask HR if this is policy. She started today!

She thinks it's a racism thing. I'm not so sure, but I don't have any other explanation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago

Your title suggests that you're asking whether it seems like a violation to you.

Only you can answer this question.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

🛑 halt!

you're in violation of the cooperative principle.

please report to the authorities.

[-] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

I love tom scott.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

me too! international treasure. and yes, that's where i learned about grice's maxims.

[-] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

It genuinely helped me with communication I think. (I'm autistic)

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

that's awesome! also a great way to detect and maybe even argue against bad faith arguments. you can tell people are arguing in bad faith when they're not cooperating about what you're telling them (pretending "black lives matter" implies "other lives don't" is a clear example of a non-cooperative interpretation in order to portray it as a malicious sentiment).

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I do thinks it a violation, or at the least, it's a strange request, especially given the context I noted.

What I'm asking is, "What's everyone else's take on this?"

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024

388 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

44196 readers

1187 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS