25
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] moormaan@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Quantum computing has been touted as the next frontier for at least a decade now, so I'm wondering why we still aren't seeing any reporting on some breakthroughs, and whether this is due to it all still being beyond the understanding of general public or there just not being any meaningful developments to speak of at all.

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Quantum computing is like fusion power. There are so many complicated little details that we discover as we go and that have to be exactly right that success at a meaningful scale is always just over the horizon.

I only read about this stuff, so I might be completely wrong and the analogy might actually be stupid. :)

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

BTW this was also true for the creation of the silicon transistor if I remember correctly. Having to have many things exactly right for it to work well.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

AI was also touted as the next frontier for over 20 years before it would take the world by storm after big advancements in the 2010's. Remember the fanfare over Deep Blue vs Kasparov in 1997? On the other hand, blockchain also surpassed a decade of vaporware discourse and there's still no major technological gains in sight. "Time Of Hype" doesn't seem to be a good predictor of success.

My personal opinion is that Quantum Computing isn't going to be as lucrative and world changing as AI (Generative and LLMs specifically) has been, but it is going to be relevant for technical details and enable other wildly imaginative things to be built on top of it, like LED was revolutionary but in a different way, so it might still be very fruitful investment.

[-] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AI was also touted as the next frontier for over 20 years before it would take the world by storm after big advancements in the 2010โ€™s.

The first AI winter was in 1966. Try something closer to 50 years, at very least.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Fair. I was purposefully imprecise with "over X years" because AI as a field changed a lot since the 1960's and a lot of the hype was coming from science fiction instead of real R&D results, but I don't disagree.

[-] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AI as a field changed a lot since the 1960โ€™s

Has it, though? In 1970, the second AI winter pushed in from the north after ANNs didn't become as revolutionary as imagined.

Guess what serves as the backbone of AI today? That's right, ANNs. We've been on the right track for those 50 years. But it took a lot of iteration to suss out the small details โ€“ and there is still a lot more work to do.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It has, from my pov of course.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
25 points (90.3% liked)

Canada

7166 readers
329 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS