412
submitted 4 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Just in case you had any doubt about whether he intends to stage another coup attempt if he loses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago

This is disgusting, to state the obvious.

But also a really dumb electoral strategy, so all good!

[-] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 4 months ago

Its not election strategy at all, this prep for a coup attempt. He knows he's lost, and now he's whistling off the back porch prepping his dogs to dowhat he is too dumb and fat to do on his own.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 39 points 4 months ago

Trump hasn't lost yet - not by a long shot - but this definitely is him preparing Plan B. This is basically just him signalling to his most loyal fans that if things don't go their way in November, they'll be richly awarded for another Jan 6 - only doing it "right" this time.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

I disagree about this being Plan B. I honestly think this is exactly the plan and that he's trying to steal more money from his base while building up their bloodlust.

If he wins, send the mob to pacify his opponents. If he loses, send the mob to disrupt the elections.

I also think it's a matter of time before he finally instructs his base outright to go to the polls and make sure people are voting for the right candidate.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 0 points 4 months ago

I think there are easier^[1] ways^[2] to steal the election than a violent insurrection.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I don't know why people keep saying "steal the election." I'm sure that's a soft goal, but as long as they can foment a civil war, profits are guaranteed.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The coup is 100% plan A. This has been Trump's strategy since at least 2000, if not even earlier than that. Their efforts to insert partisan saboteurs into the elections bureaucracy and erode public trust not only didn't stop after the last presidential election, they didn't even slow down.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 28 points 4 months ago

Love the optimism, but in no way has Trump "already lost", nor do I think he believes that. Please make sure you and your social circle vote, volunteer, and donate to get people to the polls!

[-] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Eh, he may not know it know it, but he fears he has and this the plan b being brought closer to the fold.

But yes of course vote.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Actually winning 270+ electoral college votes was always plan B. Disrupting the counting/certification and getting put into power by a one-vote-per-state poll in the House or coronated by SCOTUS like in Bush v. Gore (which three of the current justices worked for Bush on, BTW) is 100% plan A.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I’m currently in the “blue no matter who” camp. Harris has momentum, but Trump still has an edge in the electoral college and that’s what actually matters.

Controversially, I’ll say that: there are no undecided voters. The person that will win is the one who can actually get their supporters to the polls. Last time around Trump got 74 million people to vote for him and as much as Lemmy/Reddit whatever site you visit seems to think that Harris is winning, it’s all about voter turnout.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Couldn't the FBI... Idk

Arrest attendees based on probable cause relating to January 6th?

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

I thought most of them were told to stay away from each other.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

At this time, everything is an election strategy.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

"We are all domestic terrorists."

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

So why don't we, idk, lock him up until the election is over?

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
412 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2608 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS