[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, the ad dollars all went to Facebook and Instagram, since they're better-able to deliver the kind of targeting that advertisers want, so most local news stopped being financially viable.

92
submitted 16 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
30
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
90
submitted 18 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Harris campaign is trying to transform women in battleground states into an organizing force who can drive their friends and family to the polls.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

It could, but in practice never is; it's always things like "we want you to put street numbers on your drivers license, but the reservations don't have street numbers" or "We'll accept concealed carry permits, but not student IDs" or "gee, urban residents are less likely to have a driver's license, let's mandate that"

495

One more reason to never vote for the guy; you never know when he's going to decide he doesn't like your state, and lets it rot during a disaster.

169
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 49 points 1 day ago

Most of them have a national ID that everybody gets, not the complex mix of IDs that the US has.

If we had that, and everybody had a national ID as a matter of routine, it wouldn't be a big deal. But we don't, because issuing one would be the mark of the beast or something.

264

The way voter ID laws like this prevent citizens from voting is generally considered a feature — by restricting ID forms common among the young, such as student IDs, they change the makeup of the electorate to favor Republicans.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Right. There's impeachment, but actually using it to remove people from power requires a supermajority, which makes it substantially ineffective against a criminal political party

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

They actually built a database of willing sycophants as part of it.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 2 days ago

In general, preventing abuse via static rules is really difficult. People who want to abuse the system are innovative. Most systems really depend on having people who respond to the abuse by stopping it more than having specific written rules to block the kinds of abuse that have happened in the past.

126

But only norms and precedents, not laws, prevent this. In our system, the attorney general and the director of the F.B.I. sit within the executive branch and answer to the president.

How might a politically motivated prosecution actually unfold? The steps below show exactly how Trump could make his threats real — all while staying within the constitutional limits on presidential power.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

Political change tends to be like that — nothing at all for a long period when you don't have the power to act, and sudden rapid change when you do.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

Mostly because the progressives didn't control them in the early 1900s, so they don't have legislature-bypassing initiatives, and even in states where you do have that, it's expensive to get one through.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

While I've known that for a while, a lot of the press was in utter denial months after he gave this money, as with this NYT article dated December 10, 2022

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 34 points 3 days ago

Four states don't use first-past-the-post for legislative elections. In particular:

  • Alaska - uses a top-4 primary + ranked choice general
  • Maine - uses ranked choice voting
  • California & Washington - use top-two primaries (note: CA can be top-3 if there is a tie for 2nd place)

If a third party wanted to succeed, they would put significant resources into winning legislative and congressional seats in those places. I don't see any of them actually doing that though.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 days ago

They wanted to redact witness names before releasing it.

417

This post uses a gift link which may be limited in how many times it can be viewed. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article available

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

An archived copy shows

J.D. Vance Freaks Out Over the Slightest Pushback in V.P. Debate

371

The filing itself is here.

35
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
  • A one-time operation to deport these immigrants would cost at least $315 billion
  • Deporting one million immigrants per year would incur an annual cost of $88 billion, with the majority of that cost going towards building detention camps
  • Overall, mass deportation would lead to a loss of 4.2 percent to 6.8 percent of annual U.S. GDP
129
305
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

silence7

joined 1 year ago