253
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The head of Telegram, Pavel Durov, has been charged by the French judiciary for allegedly allowing criminal activity on the messaging app but avoided jail with a €5m bail.

The Russian-born multi-billionaire, who has French citizenship, was granted release on condition that he report to a police station twice a week and remain in France, Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau said in a statement.

The charges against Durov include complicity in the spread of sexual images of children and a litany of other alleged violations on the messaging app.

His surprise arrest has put a spotlight on the criminal liability of Telegram, the popular app with around 1 billion users, and has sparked debate over free speech and government censorship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Greg@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago
[-] w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago

Don't leave out Spez.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Meta is literally ad platform for scam. But it’s american, so it’s ok.

[-] ampersandcastles@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It's the same shit. I was advertised psylocibin shit on facebook before.

[-] GreyCat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The problem is that those guys comply with the requests from governments.

[-] scorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

do you agree with this arrest or are you pointing out the double standards ?

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

I don't really understand how he allowed crime. I can commit crime via sms, whatsapp, signal or mail. Does that mean they allow it?

[-] Greg@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I can commit crime via sms, whatsapp, signal or mail.

But you're not allowed to

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Against the law at the minimum.

[-] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think the distinction here is that if your phone provider, WhatsApp, Signal or mail carrier is informed that someone is engaging in illegal activity using their service, these entities would comply and give the information they have on you-- be it a lot like SMS or a little like Signal (phone number, registration date).

In the case of Telegram, they've been informed countless times that specific individuals are engaging in blatantly illegal activity and unlike the previously mentioned entities, Telegram is refusing to comply with any legal requests.

I believe that's the situation but if I'm wrong, by all means correct me because this is a very interesting subject.

[-] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, this is the first explanation that's actually clicked for me.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Presumably Moxie as well since I'm constantly being told that Signal is the most secure e2ee platform.

[-] Greg@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Telegram holds the keys, Signal doesn't

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

That's right, Signal only holds phone numbers for some unspecified reason.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
253 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

31638 readers
77 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS